Richard Brook

24 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Richard Brook
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 96
  • Statistics and Probability 79
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 64
  • Applied Psychology 33
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 85
Replace Janneke Staaks with:
Janneke Staaks Netherlands
Bernard J. Fine United States
James S. McGinley United States
James Davies United Kingdom
Lorna Duggan United Kingdom
Thomas J. Hummel United States
Juan C. Suárez‐Falcón Spain
Kristen Joan Anderson United States
Keith W. Jacobs United States
Peter Johnson United Kingdom
Richard Brook relative to Janneke Staaks Netherlands Janneke Staaks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Janneke Staaks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Brook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Brook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Brook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Brook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Brook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Brook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Brook. The network helps show where Richard Brook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Richard Brook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Brook Line = papers co-authored together Richard Brook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993147
2 1992100
3 197648
4 198439
5 197627
6 199526
7 199922
8 198921
9 199111
10
200010
11 19809
12 20118
13 19836
14
Psychosocial dysfunctions as precursors to amphetamine abuse among adolescents.
19766
15
Cold War Cities: Politics, Culture and Atomic Urbanism, 1945–1965
20205
16 19955
17 19875
18 19813
19 19842
20 19832

About Richard Brook

Richard Brook is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability and Clinical Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (4 papers), Multi-Criteria Decision Making (2 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (2 papers), Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (2 papers), Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization (1 paper), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (1 paper) and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (96 citations), Statistics and Probability (79 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (64 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (85 citations). Richard Brook has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Slovakia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Keith J. Petrie, Roger J. Booth, Terry Moore, Philip Dewe, Nick Dunn and Martin Dodge. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Statistical Association, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Psychosomatic Medicine and British Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact