Richard Ashdowne
Impact in
- Classics top 5%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Language and Linguistics top 10%
- Linguistics and language evolution
- Lexicography and Language Studies
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies
Papers in
-
- Linguistics and language evolution 3
- Historical Linguistics and Language Studies 1
- Lexicography and Language Studies 1
- Linguistics and Cultural Studies 1
- Classics 1
- Medieval Literature and History 1
- Co-authors
- Rob Latham (1 shared paper)Avril A. Powell (1 shared paper)David Howlett (1 shared paper)James Blundell (1 shared paper)Cynthia White (1 shared paper)Klaus Korn (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Arts and Humanities in Higher Education (1 paper)Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (1 paper)Oxford University Press eBooks (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Richard Ashdowne
2 papers receiving 47 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Classics 40
- Language and Linguistics 34
- Linguistics and Language 12
- History 23
- Anatomy 3
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Ashdowne
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Ashdowne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Ashdowne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Ashdowne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Ashdowne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Ashdowne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Ashdowne. The network helps show where Richard Ashdowne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Richard Ashdowne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dictionary of Medieval Latin from British Sources | 2011 | 67 |
| 2 | 2008 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 5 | E-vocative invocation: on the historical morphosyntax of latin 'Oaths' | 2008 | 0 |
About Richard Ashdowne
Richard Ashdowne is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Classics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 5 papers that have together received 69 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Linguistics and language evolution (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (1 paper), Lexicography and Language Studies (1 paper), Mathematics, Computing, and Information Processing (1 paper), Second Language Acquisition and Learning (1 paper), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (1 paper) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (40 citations), Language and Linguistics (34 citations), Linguistics and Language (12 citations), History (23 citations) and Anatomy (3 citations). Richard Ashdowne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rob Latham, Avril A. Powell, David Howlett, James Blundell, Cynthia White and Klaus Korn. Their work appears in journals such as Arts and Humanities in Higher Education, Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja), Oxford University Press eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.