Reza Banakar
- Law top 0.5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Max Travers
- Topics
- Law in Society and Culture (15 papers)Comparative and International Law Studies (8 papers)Legal Education and Practice Innovations (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwedenJapanUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Reza Banakar
33 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Law 176
- Political Science and International Relations 140
- Sociology and Political Science 127
- Gender Studies 18
- Economics and Econometrics 17
Countries citing papers authored by Reza Banakar
This map shows the geographic impact of Reza Banakar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reza Banakar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reza Banakar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Reza Banakar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Reza Banakar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Reza Banakar. The network helps show where Reza Banakar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Reza Banakar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Reza Banakar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Reza Banakar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Reza Banakar. Reza Banakar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Law, Love and Responsibility : A Note on Solidarity in EU Law | 2 |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | Law and social theory | 7 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Who Needs the Classics? - On the Relevance of Classical Legal Sociology for the Study of Current Social and Legal Problems | 3 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | Review: "A life of H.L.A. Hart: the nightmare of the noble dream, by Nicola Lacey | 1 |
| 15 | Theory and method in socio-legal research | 103 |
| 16 | Studying Cases Empirically: A Sociological Method for Studying Discrimination Cases in Sweden | 3 |
| 17 | 78 | |
| 18 | Contrasting Criminal Justice: Getting from here to there. Edited by David Nelken. Ashgate/Dartmouth 2000 | 2 |
| 19 | “A Passage to ‘India’: Toward a Transformative Interdisciplinary Discourse on Law and Society” | 2 |
| 20 | Det offentliga samtalet om etnokulturella frågor | 0 |
About Reza Banakar
Reza Banakar is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 43 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law in Society and Culture (15 papers), Comparative and International Law Studies (8 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (176 citations), Political Science and International Relations (140 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (127 citations). Reza Banakar has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Japan and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Max Travers. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Journal of Law and Society and Social & Legal Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.