Peter W. Hogg
- Law top 0.2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (32 papers)Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (19 papers)Criminal Law and Evidence (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Peter W. Hogg
36 papers receiving 386 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Law 361
- Political Science and International Relations 251
- Sociology and Political Science 210
- Economics and Econometrics 68
- Strategy and Management 40
Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. Hogg
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. Hogg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. Hogg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. Hogg. The network helps show where Peter W. Hogg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter W. Hogg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter W. Hogg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter W. Hogg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter W. Hogg. Peter W. Hogg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Constitutional basis of aboriginal rights | 2 |
| 5 | A Reply on | 0 |
| 6 | Charter Dialogue Revisited – Or Much Ado About Metaphors | 24 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | An Implicit Algorithm for Capturing Sharp Fluid Interfaces in the Volume of Fluid Advection Method | 6 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | Canadian law in the Constitutional Court of South Africa | 1 |
| 14 | 94 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Meech Lake Constitutional Accord annotated | 10 |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | The Constitutionality of the Competition Bill | 0 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Peter W. Hogg
Peter W. Hogg is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Accounting, having authored 59 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (32 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (19 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (361 citations), Political Science and International Relations (251 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (210 citations). Peter W. Hogg has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Xiao-Jun Gu, David R. Emerson, Jinyan Li, Robert Nozick and Allan C. Hutchinson. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Public Policy, Law and Contemporary Problems and The American Journal of Comparative Law.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.