Ren-Zong Qiu

6.3k total citations
11 papers, 78 citations indexed

About

Ren-Zong Qiu is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Ren-Zong Qiu has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 78 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 2 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Ren-Zong Qiu's work include Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). Ren-Zong Qiu is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers). Ren-Zong Qiu collaborates with scholars based in China, United Kingdom and United States. Ren-Zong Qiu's co-authors include Wei Zhu, Ruth Chadwick, Dorothy C. Wertz, Michael Kirby, Richard Nicholson, Ishwar C. Verma, Thomas H. Murray, Hiraku Takebe, Hans-Georg Koch and Bartha Maria Knoppers and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics and The Hastings Center Report.

In The Last Decade

Ren-Zong Qiu

11 papers receiving 73 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ren-Zong Qiu China	6	50	31	13	10	9	11	78
Sue Eckstein United Kingdom	4	58 1.2×	30 1.0×	22 1.7×	9 0.9×	3 0.3×	12	104
S. Barron Ireland	4	36 0.7×	8 0.3×	5 0.4×	19 1.9×	5 0.6×	7	86
Julia Inthorn Germany	6	58 1.2×	35 1.1×	6 0.5×	25 2.5×	2 0.2×	14	113
Sarah Everest United Kingdom	3	42 0.8×	20 0.6×	12 0.9×	8 0.8×	3 0.3×	3	67
Donna Antoine‐LaVigne United States	6	33 0.7×	24 0.8×	9 0.7×	3 0.3×	7 0.8×	10	90
Moira A. Keane United States	3	77 1.5×	67 2.2×	28 2.2×	5 0.5×		3	97
Dietrich von Engelhardt Germany	6	9 0.2×	14 0.5×	8 0.6×	8 0.8×	7 0.8×	46	119
Delia B. Carba Philippines	7	25 0.5×	12 0.4×	12 0.9×	3 0.3×	19 2.1×	19	126
Elizabeth Cook United States	6	27 0.5×	17 0.5×	10 0.8×	5 0.5×	2 0.2×	8	81
Rainald von Gizycki United States	4	28 0.6×	67 2.2×	4 0.3×		10 1.1×	13	127

Countries citing papers authored by Ren-Zong Qiu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ren-Zong Qiu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ren-Zong Qiu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ren-Zong Qiu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ren-Zong Qiu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ren-Zong Qiu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ren-Zong Qiu. The network helps show where Ren-Zong Qiu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ren-Zong Qiu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ren-Zong Qiu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ren-Zong Qiu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ren-Zong Qiu. Ren-Zong Qiu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Zhu, Wei, et al.. (2019). Reboot ethics governance in China. Nature. 569(7755). 184–186. 16 indexed citations

2.

Qiu, Ren-Zong, et al.. (2009). Sexual rights and gender roles in a religious context. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 106(2). 151–155. 7 indexed citations

3.

Qiu, Ren-Zong. (2004). BIOETHICS: ASIAN PERSPECTIVES: A QUEST FOR MORAL DIVERSITY. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 5 indexed citations

4.

Knoppers, Bartha Maria, Ruth Chadwick, Hiraku Takebe, et al.. (2000). HUGO Urges Genetic Benefit-Sharing. Public Health Genomics. 3(2). 88–92. 14 indexed citations

5.

Qiu, Ren-Zong. (1991). Morality in Flux: Medical Ethics Dilemmas in the People's Republic of China. Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal. 1(1). 16–27. 15 indexed citations

6.

Qiu, Ren-Zong. (1989). Equity and Public Health Care in China. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 14(3). 283–287. 1 indexed citations

7.

Qiu, Ren-Zong, et al.. (1989). Can Late Abortion be Ethically Justified?. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 14(3). 343–350. 1 indexed citations

8.

Qiu, Ren-Zong. (1988). Medicine - The Art of Humaneness: On Ethics of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 13(3). 277–299. 8 indexed citations

9.

Qiu, Ren-Zong. (1988). Medicine, the art of humaneness: on ethics of traditional Chinese medicine.. PubMed. 13(3). 277–300. 8 indexed citations

10.

Nicholson, Richard, et al.. (1987). "No feeding tubes for me!. PubMed. 17(3). S23–6. 2 indexed citations

11.

Nicholson, Richard, et al.. (1987). Case Study: "No Feeding Tubes for Me!". The Hastings Center Report. 17(3). 23–23. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact