Julia Inthorn

695 citations
14 papers · 113 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Julia Inthorn

12 papers receiving 107 citations

Peers

Julia Inthorn
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Health Informatics 3
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 58
  • General Health Professions 35
  • Clinical Psychology 25
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 2
Replace Samuel J. Kerstein with:
Samuel J. Kerstein United States
Heather Hammer United States
Ryan Spellecy United States
Amedeo Santosuosso Italy
Suzanne Metselaar Netherlands
Laura Palazzani Italy
Veronica English United Kingdom
Laura Wagner United States
Kohei Kajiwara Japan
Sabine Wöhlke Germany
Julia Inthorn relative to Samuel J. Kerstein United States Samuel J. Kerstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Samuel J. Kerstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Julia Inthorn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Julia Inthorn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia Inthorn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia Inthorn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Julia Inthorn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia Inthorn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia Inthorn. The network helps show where Julia Inthorn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Julia Inthorn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Julia Inthorn Line = papers co-authored together Julia Inthorn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201436
2 201423
3 202014
4 201411
5 20226
6
Fuzzy logic and preconceptional genetic carrier screening
20146
7 20215
8 20175
9 20223
10 20152
11
[Wishes and perspectives of patients in the establishment of advance directives. Results on a study on patients' perspective in Austria].
20081
12 20171
13 20230
14 20100

About Julia Inthorn

Julia Inthorn is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 113 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (2 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (2 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (1 paper) and Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (3 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (58 citations), General Health Professions (35 citations), Clinical Psychology (25 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2 citations). Julia Inthorn has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Silke Schicktanz, Sabine Wöhlke, Marcel Mertz, Fabian Schmidt, Jan Schildmann, Sabine Salloch, Aviad E. Raz, Norbert W. Paul, André Kidszun and Joschka Haltaufderheide. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Ethics, Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, JAMA Pediatrics, Acta Paediatrica and Public Health Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact