Renling Jin

413 citations
37 papers · 168 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Renling Jin

34 papers receiving 150 citations

Peers

Renling Jin
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 66
  • Geometry and Topology 125
  • Mathematical Physics 105
  • Theoretical Computer Science 6
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 85
Replace Randall McCutcheon with:
Randall McCutcheon United States
Martin Edjvet United Kingdom
Yair Glasner Israel
Lyubomyr Zdomskyy Austria
Andreas Baudisch Germany
Daan Krammer United Kingdom
José Burillo Spain
Lee Stanley Israel
Deirdre Haskell Canada
M. Malliaris United States
Renling Jin relative to Randall McCutcheon United States Randall McCutcheon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Randall McCutcheon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Renling Jin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Renling Jin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renling Jin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renling Jin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Renling Jin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renling Jin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renling Jin. The network helps show where Renling Jin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Renling Jin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Renling Jin Line = papers co-authored together Renling Jin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200120
2 201017
3 200114
4 199212
5 200710
6 20008
7 19926
8 19946
9 20146
10 20065
11 20025
12 19915
13 20025
14 20084
15 20004
16 19934
17 19914
18 20184
19 20153
20 19923

About Renling Jin

Renling Jin is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 37 papers that have together received 168 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Topology and Set Theory (27 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (21 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (19 papers), Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (10 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (4 papers), Advanced Banach Space Theory (3 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (3 papers) and Functional Equations Stability Results (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (66 citations), Geometry and Topology (125 citations), Mathematical Physics (105 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (85 citations). Renling Jin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Saharon Shelah, H. Jerome Keisler, Mauro Di Nasso, Karl Mahlburg, Vitaly Bergelson, Martino Lupini, Andreas Blass and Lev Borisov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Symbolic Logic, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Archive for Mathematical Logic and Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact