Renée M. Smith

528 total citations
9 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

Renée M. Smith is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Renée M. Smith has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations, 3 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 2 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Renée M. Smith's work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers) and Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (2 papers). Renée M. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 papers), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (3 papers) and Radiation Effects and Dosimetry (2 papers). Renée M. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Renée M. Smith's co-authors include Janet M. Box‐Steffensmeier, Charles W. Ostrom, Corwin D. Smidt, Brandon L. Bartels, Ferran Martı́n, George D. Rose, F. Stichelbaut, Robert B. Miller, G. Alan Robison and L.M. Young and has published in prestigious journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms.

In The Last Decade

Renée M. Smith

9 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Renée M. Smith United States 6 215 151 108 102 52 9 339
Jean‐Dominique Lafay France 7 320 1.5× 183 1.2× 108 1.0× 51 0.5× 73 1.4× 19 391
Suzanna Linn United States 8 83 0.4× 64 0.4× 73 0.7× 29 0.3× 26 0.5× 11 246
Daniela Campello Brazil 10 164 0.8× 84 0.6× 99 0.9× 49 0.5× 63 1.2× 19 304
Jean Magnan de Bornier France 4 262 1.2× 160 1.1× 87 0.8× 37 0.4× 71 1.4× 12 331
Joseph Daniel Ura United States 10 242 1.1× 148 1.0× 95 0.9× 14 0.1× 59 1.1× 25 398
Clément Malgouyres France 9 62 0.3× 147 1.0× 102 0.9× 84 0.8× 27 0.5× 30 273
Patrick C. Wohlfarth United States 9 141 0.7× 256 1.7× 69 0.6× 17 0.2× 48 0.9× 21 432
R. Douglas Rivers 3 285 1.3× 223 1.5× 106 1.0× 69 0.7× 44 0.8× 4 361
Craig F. Emmert United States 9 66 0.3× 140 0.9× 75 0.7× 56 0.5× 78 1.5× 17 298
Gary Krueger United States 8 140 0.7× 112 0.7× 45 0.4× 38 0.4× 28 0.5× 21 274

Countries citing papers authored by Renée M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Renée M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renée M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renée M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Renée M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renée M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renée M. Smith. The network helps show where Renée M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Renée M. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Renée M. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Renée M. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Renée M. Smith. Renée M. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Bartels, Brandon L., Janet M. Box‐Steffensmeier, Corwin D. Smidt, & Renée M. Smith. (2010). The dynamic properties of individual-level party identification in the United States. Electoral Studies. 30(1). 210–222. 22 indexed citations
2.
Stichelbaut, F., et al.. (2004). X-ray dosimetry: comparing Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 71(1-2). 345–349. 5 indexed citations
3.
Miller, Robert B., et al.. (2003). A high-power electron linear accelerator for food irradiation applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 211(4). 562–570. 13 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Renée M.. (1998). The Public Presidency Hits the Wall: Clinton's Presidential Initiative on Race. Presidential Studies Quarterly. 28(4). 780. 3 indexed citations
5.
Box‐Steffensmeier, Janet M. & Renée M. Smith. (1998). Investigating Political Dynamics Using Fractional Integration Methods. American Journal of Political Science. 42(2). 661–661. 74 indexed citations
6.
Box‐Steffensmeier, Janet M. & Renée M. Smith. (1997). Heterogeneity and Individual Party Identification. 5 indexed citations
7.
Box‐Steffensmeier, Janet M. & Renée M. Smith. (1996). The Dynamics of Aggregate Partisanship. American Political Science Review. 90(3). 567–580. 113 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Renée M.. (1992). Error Correction, Attractors, and Cointegration: Substantive and Methodological Issues. Political Analysis. 4. 249–254. 21 indexed citations
9.
Ostrom, Charles W. & Renée M. Smith. (1992). Error Correction, Attitude Persistence, and Executive Rewards and Punishments: A Behavioral Theory of Presidential Approval. Political Analysis. 4. 127–183. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026