Patrick C. Wohlfarth

807 total citations
21 papers, 432 citations indexed

About

Patrick C. Wohlfarth is a scholar working on Law, Economics and Econometrics and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Patrick C. Wohlfarth has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 432 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Law, 16 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Patrick C. Wohlfarth's work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (17 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (16 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (10 papers). Patrick C. Wohlfarth is often cited by papers focused on Judicial and Constitutional Studies (17 papers), Legal and Constitutional Studies (16 papers) and Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (10 papers). Patrick C. Wohlfarth collaborates with scholars based in United States, Qatar and United Kingdom. Patrick C. Wohlfarth's co-authors include Peter K. Enns, Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, Joseph Daniel Ura, Ryan C. Black, Nathan J. Kelly, Takaaki Masaki, Brian J. Fogarty and James G. Gimpel and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Political Science, The Journal of Politics and Law & Society Review.

In The Last Decade

Patrick C. Wohlfarth

17 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Patrick C. Wohlfarth United States 9 316 256 141 69 48 21 432
Kevin T. McGuire United States 14 654 2.1× 490 1.9× 197 1.4× 82 1.2× 105 2.2× 27 765
Matthew E. K. Hall United States 10 303 1.0× 234 0.9× 92 0.7× 60 0.9× 41 0.9× 36 370
Akhil Reed Amar United States 10 180 0.6× 102 0.4× 267 1.9× 124 1.8× 15 0.3× 84 397
Sara C. Benesh United States 10 382 1.2× 276 1.1× 106 0.8× 122 1.8× 27 0.6× 19 481
Vlad Perju United States 6 230 0.7× 53 0.2× 204 1.4× 105 1.5× 29 0.6× 25 346
Ryan C. Black United States 16 575 1.8× 415 1.6× 184 1.3× 61 0.9× 62 1.3× 62 673
Antonin Scalia United States 8 195 0.6× 108 0.4× 102 0.7× 50 0.7× 22 0.5× 26 314
Mark A. Graber United States 12 392 1.2× 237 0.9× 262 1.9× 119 1.7× 29 0.6× 79 545
Philip L. Dubois United States 11 250 0.8× 227 0.9× 162 1.1× 53 0.8× 28 0.6× 18 350
Jesse H. Choper United States 8 264 0.8× 139 0.5× 224 1.6× 119 1.7× 37 0.8× 61 443

Countries citing papers authored by Patrick C. Wohlfarth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick C. Wohlfarth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick C. Wohlfarth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick C. Wohlfarth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick C. Wohlfarth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick C. Wohlfarth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick C. Wohlfarth. The network helps show where Patrick C. Wohlfarth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick C. Wohlfarth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick C. Wohlfarth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick C. Wohlfarth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick C. Wohlfarth. Patrick C. Wohlfarth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2023). Considering Constitutional Change: Survey Evidence on Public Attitudes Toward Term Limits for Federal Judges. New Political Science. 45(2). 335–358. 2 indexed citations
2.
Ura, Joseph Daniel & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2021). Greater public confidence in the US Supreme Court predicts more jurisdiction stripping. Political Science Research and Methods. 10(4). 831–839.
3.
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2021). On Estimating Personality Traits of US Supreme Court Justices. UKnowledge (University of Kentucky). 9(2). 371–396. 1 indexed citations
4.
Fogarty, Brian J., et al.. (2020). Personalizing the U.S. Supreme Court Through Attention to Individual Justices. Social Science Quarterly. 101(2). 825–841. 4 indexed citations
5.
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2019). The Conscientious Justice. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations
6.
Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. (2019). How the prospect of judicial review shapes bureaucratic decision making. Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill).
7.
Owens, Ryan J. & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2019). The Influence of Home-State Reputation and Public Opinion on Federal Circuit Court Judges. 7(2). 187–214. 3 indexed citations
8.
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2017). Supreme Court Opinions and Audiences. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 54(1). 169–181.
9.
Enns, Peter K., Nathan J. Kelly, Takaaki Masaki, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2017). Moving forward with time series analysis. Research & Politics. 4(4). 3 indexed citations
10.
Owens, Ryan J. & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2017). Public Mood, Previous Electoral Experience, and Responsiveness Among Federal Circuit Court Judges. American Politics Research. 45(6). 1003–1031. 7 indexed citations
11.
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2016). U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and their Audiences. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 42 indexed citations
12.
Enns, Peter K., Nathan J. Kelly, Takaaki Masaki, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2016). Don’t jettison the general error correction model just yet: A practical guide to avoiding spurious regression with the GECM. Research & Politics. 3(2). 30 indexed citations
13.
Black, Ryan C., Ryan J. Owens, Justin Wedeking, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2016). The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity. Law & Society Review. 50(3). 703–732. 32 indexed citations
14.
Owens, Ryan J., et al.. (2015). Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts: An Empirical Examination of Selection and Retention Methods. State Politics & Policy Quarterly. 15(2). 211–238. 6 indexed citations
15.
Owens, Ryan J. & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2014). State Solicitors General, Appellate Expertise, and State Success Before the U.S. Supreme Court. Law & Society Review. 48(3). 657–685. 11 indexed citations
16.
Enns, Peter K. & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2013). The Swing Justice. The Journal of Politics. 75(4). 1089–1107. 21 indexed citations
17.
Owens, Ryan J., Justin Wedeking, & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2013). How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review. 1(1). 35–59. 48 indexed citations
18.
Ura, Joseph Daniel & Patrick C. Wohlfarth. (2010). “An Appeal to the People”: Public Opinion and Congressional Support for the Supreme Court. The Journal of Politics. 72(4). 939–956. 42 indexed citations
19.
Enns, Peter K., et al.. (2010). How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science. 55(1). 74–88. 142 indexed citations
20.
Wohlfarth, Patrick C.. (2009). The Tenth Justice? Consequences of Politicization in the Solicitor General's Office. The Journal of Politics. 71(1). 224–237. 34 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kevin T. McGuire Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthew E. K. Hall Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Akhil Reed Amar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sara C. Benesh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Vlad Perju Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ryan C. Black Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Antonin Scalia Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark A. Graber Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Philip L. Dubois Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jesse H. Choper
Rankless by CCL
2026