Joseph Daniel Ura
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Law top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christopher EllisPatrick C. WohlfarthMatthew E. K. HallMichelle M. Taylor‐RobinsonSylvia ManzanoSoren JordanStacia L. HaynieJames R. Rogers
- Topics
- Judicial and Constitutional Studies (16 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 papers)Legal and Constitutional Studies (10 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Political ScienceThe Journal of PoliticsJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
- Partner nations
- United StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Joseph Daniel Ura
24 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- Political Science and International Relations 242
- Law 156
- Economics and Econometrics 148
- Sociology and Political Science 95
- Gender Studies 66
Countries citing papers authored by Joseph Daniel Ura
This map shows the geographic impact of Joseph Daniel Ura's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joseph Daniel Ura with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joseph Daniel Ura more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joseph Daniel Ura
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joseph Daniel Ura. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joseph Daniel Ura. The network helps show where Joseph Daniel Ura may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joseph Daniel Ura
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joseph Daniel Ura. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joseph Daniel Ura based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joseph Daniel Ura. Joseph Daniel Ura is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Confidence and Constraint: Public Opinion, Judicial Independence, and the Roberts Court | 2 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Backlash and Legitimation: Macro Political Responses to Supreme Court Decisions | 4 |
| 13 | 52 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 103 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Joseph Daniel Ura
Joseph Daniel Ura is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 25 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Judicial and Constitutional Studies (16 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (12 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (156 citations), Political Science and International Relations (242 citations) and Gender Studies (66 citations). Joseph Daniel Ura has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Ellis, Patrick C. Wohlfarth, Matthew E. K. Hall, Michelle M. Taylor‐Robinson, Sylvia Manzano, Soren Jordan, Stacia L. Haynie, James R. Rogers and Francisco I. Pedraza. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Political Science, The Journal of Politics and Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.