Rebekka Rohner
About
In The Last Decade
Rebekka Rohner
10 papers receiving 223 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Demography 164
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 65
- Sociology and Political Science 49
- General Health Professions 37
- Health 32
Countries citing papers authored by Rebekka Rohner
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebekka Rohner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebekka Rohner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebekka Rohner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebekka Rohner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebekka Rohner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebekka Rohner. The network helps show where Rebekka Rohner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebekka Rohner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebekka Rohner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebekka Rohner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebekka Rohner. Rebekka Rohner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.