Rebecca O’Reilly
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Barbara BealeDonna GilliesKath PetersYenna SalamonsonDebra JacksonSharon AndrewRoslyn WeaverChristine Taylor
- Topics
- Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers)Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Rebecca O’Reilly
21 papers receiving 383 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Clinical Psychology 168
- Health 163
- Sociology and Political Science 109
- General Health Professions 99
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 90
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca O’Reilly
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca O’Reilly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca O’Reilly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca O’Reilly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca O’Reilly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca O’Reilly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca O’Reilly. The network helps show where Rebecca O’Reilly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca O’Reilly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca O’Reilly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca O’Reilly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca O’Reilly. Rebecca O’Reilly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | New graduate job applications and interviews: The role of higher education facilities for student nurses and midwives | 3 |
| 14 | 107 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 85 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | Psychiatrists' experience of suicide in their patients. | 19 |
About Rebecca O’Reilly
Rebecca O’Reilly is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Health and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 24 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (8 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (49 citations), Health (163 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (14 citations). Rebecca O’Reilly has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Beale, Donna Gillies, Kath Peters, Yenna Salamonson, Debra Jackson, Sharon Andrew, Roslyn Weaver, Christine Taylor, Lauretta Luck and Lesley Wilkes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.