Kath Peters
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Research and Theory top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Debra JacksonElizabeth HalcombSusan McInnesLesley WilkesLeah EastGillian MurphyFiona McDermidYenna Salamonson
- Topics
- Nursing education and management (30 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (16 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Kath Peters
162 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
- General Health Professions 1.6k
- Clinical Psychology 1.0k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 969
- Sociology and Political Science 675
- Research and Theory 508
Countries citing papers authored by Kath Peters
This map shows the geographic impact of Kath Peters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kath Peters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kath Peters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kath Peters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kath Peters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kath Peters. The network helps show where Kath Peters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kath Peters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kath Peters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kath Peters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kath Peters. Kath Peters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 26 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | PHYSICAL RESTRAINTS IN INTENSIVE CARE: EXPERIENCES OF PATIENTS, FAMILIES AND NURSES. | 3 |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | Intermittierende Gabe von Ulipristalacetat zur konservativen Myomtherapie und Blutungskontrolle bei Hypermenorrhoe durch Uterus myomatosus Gemeinsame Stellungnahme der DGGGEF e.V. und des BVF e.V. | 0 |
| 18 | 49 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Kath Peters
Kath Peters is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Health Professions and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 175 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing education and management (30 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (16 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (508 citations), General Health Professions (1.6k citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (71 citations). Kath Peters has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Debra Jackson, Elizabeth Halcomb, Susan McInnes, Lesley Wilkes, Leah East, Gillian Murphy, Fiona McDermid, Yenna Salamonson, Lucie M. Ramjan and Louise O’Brien. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.