Rebecca Laws
- Ecology top 2%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ian G. JamiesonShinichi NakagawaCatherine E. GrueberStephen IsonMarcus EnochDylan C. KeslerStephen PotterAllison S. Cox
- Topics
- Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers)Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaConservation BiologyBiological Conservation
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Rebecca Laws
12 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Ecology 1.1k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 706
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 653
- Global and Planetary Change 377
- Genetics 279
Countries citing papers authored by Rebecca Laws
This map shows the geographic impact of Rebecca Laws's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rebecca Laws with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rebecca Laws more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rebecca Laws
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rebecca Laws. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rebecca Laws. The network helps show where Rebecca Laws may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rebecca Laws
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rebecca Laws. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rebecca Laws based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rebecca Laws. Rebecca Laws is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | Survival, territory resources, and population persistence in the critically endangered Tuamotu Kingfisher. | 1 |
| 7 | Multimodel inference in ecology and evolution: challenges and solutionsbreakdown → | 1808 |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 77 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | Evaluation study of demand responsive transport services in Wiltshire. Final report. | 3 |
About Rebecca Laws
Rebecca Laws is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Genetics and Automotive Engineering, having authored 12 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic diversity and population structure (6 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (264 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (653 citations) and Developmental Biology (105 citations). Rebecca Laws has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ian G. Jamieson, Shinichi Nakagawa, Catherine E. Grueber, Stephen Ison, Marcus Enoch, Dylan C. Kesler, Stephen Potter, Allison S. Cox, Joshua D. Stafford and Christopher R. Rakes. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Conservation Biology and Biological Conservation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.