R.E. Loar

664 citations
16 papers · 527 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

    • Animal Nutrition and Physiology
    • Livestock and Poultry Management
    • Meat and Animal Product Quality
    • Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
    • Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Papers in

R.E. Loar

16 papers receiving 480 citations

Peers

R.E. Loar
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Animal Science and Zoology 491
  • Aquatic Science 142
  • Biochemistry 41
  • Food Science 56
  • Plant Science 104
Replace N.E. Ward with:
N.E. Ward United States
Iván Camilo Ospina-Rojas Brazil
T. Mushtaq Pakistan
Valquíria Cação da Cruz Brazil
Lúcio Francelino Araújo Brazil
K Pelícia Brazil
Édison José Fassani Brazil
A. de Coca-Sinova Spain
C. Coto United States
Tiago Goulart Petrolli Brazil
R.E. Loar relative to N.E. Ward United States N.E. Ward's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
N.E. Ward · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R.E. Loar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R.E. Loar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R.E. Loar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R.E. Loar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R.E. Loar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R.E. Loar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R.E. Loar. The network helps show where R.E. Loar may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside R.E. Loar, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R.E. Loar Line = papers co-authored together R.E. Loar links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201070
2 200967
3 200966
4 201055
5 201144
6 201441
7 201036
8 201035
9 201228
10 201027
11 201117
12 200917
13 201310
14 20137
15 20094
16 20213

About R.E. Loar

R.E. Loar is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Plant Science, Aquatic Science and Pollution, having authored 16 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (16 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (6 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (4 papers), Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health (4 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (4 papers), Moringa oleifera research and applications (4 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (1 paper) and Bird parasitology and diseases (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (491 citations), Aquatic Science (142 citations), Biochemistry (41 citations), Food Science (56 citations) and Plant Science (104 citations). R.E. Loar has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include A. Corzo, M. Wes Schilling, Janet R. Donaldson, J.S. Moritz, M.T. Kidd, Luis Fernando Mejía, V. Jackson, M.T. Kidd, W.A. Dozier and K.G.S. Wamsley. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, Poultry Science, World s Poultry Science Journal and British Poultry Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact