W.D. George

1.2k total citations
38 papers, 962 citations indexed

About

W.D. George is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, W.D. George has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 962 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Oncology, 13 papers in Cancer Research and 7 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in W.D. George's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (6 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (6 papers). W.D. George is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (10 papers), HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research (6 papers) and Estrogen and related hormone effects (6 papers). W.D. George collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and U.S. Virgin Islands. W.D. George's co-authors include E. Mallon, Gordon Murray, Arnie Purushotham, Peter McCulloch, John Winstanley, T Cooke, Angela Platt‐Higgins, R. W. Godfrey, Scott T. Willard and R.D. Macmillan and has published in prestigious journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Cancer Research and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

W.D. George

37 papers receiving 927 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W.D. George United Kingdom 18 490 308 219 192 167 38 962
F Squartini Italy 15 385 0.8× 400 1.3× 672 3.1× 130 0.7× 121 0.7× 73 1.2k
D. Ockert Germany 15 582 1.2× 125 0.4× 358 1.6× 58 0.3× 40 0.2× 47 1.2k
Karine Poussin France 16 489 1.0× 238 0.8× 478 2.2× 27 0.1× 111 0.7× 26 1.7k
Luigi Panico Italy 18 781 1.6× 563 1.8× 398 1.8× 283 1.5× 406 2.4× 51 1.5k
Andreas P. Kyriazis United States 15 319 0.7× 151 0.5× 270 1.2× 62 0.3× 44 0.3× 32 748
Katsumi Tsukazaki Japan 18 245 0.5× 128 0.4× 452 2.1× 81 0.4× 56 0.3× 65 1.1k
Jennifer N. Durham United States 18 649 1.3× 201 0.7× 379 1.7× 40 0.2× 129 0.8× 53 1.2k
Leo J. Williams United States 11 316 0.6× 125 0.4× 295 1.3× 125 0.7× 31 0.2× 12 845
Carmela Beger Germany 18 204 0.4× 230 0.7× 722 3.3× 48 0.3× 61 0.4× 30 1.3k
Zoltán Szentirmay Hungary 16 294 0.6× 146 0.5× 227 1.0× 75 0.4× 253 1.5× 59 821

Countries citing papers authored by W.D. George

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W.D. George's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W.D. George with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W.D. George more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W.D. George

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W.D. George. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W.D. George. The network helps show where W.D. George may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W.D. George

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W.D. George. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W.D. George based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W.D. George. W.D. George is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stearns, Adam T., David Hole, W.D. George, & David Kingsmore. (2007). Comparison of breast cancer mortality rates with those of ovarian and colorectal carcinoma. British journal of surgery. 94(8). 957–965. 12 indexed citations
2.
Malik, Hafiz, W.D. George, E. Mallon, et al.. (1999). Margin assessment by cavity shaving after breast-conserving surgery: analysis and follow-up of 543 patients. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 25(5). 464–469. 33 indexed citations
3.
Hagan, Christy R., et al.. (1998). Putative markers for the detection of breast carcinoma cells in blood. British Journal of Cancer. 77(8). 1203–1207. 50 indexed citations
4.
Macmillan, R.D., Arnie Purushotham, E. Mallon, J. Love, & W.D. George. (1997). Tumour bed positivity predicts outcome after breast-conserving surgery.. PubMed. 84(11). 1559–62. 33 indexed citations
5.
Nagy, János, et al.. (1996). Hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, angiogenesis and tumour cell proliferation in primary breast cancer. The Breast. 5(2). 105–109. 4 indexed citations
6.
Bissett, D., James Paul, Gordon Wishart, et al.. (1995). Epirubicin chemotherapy and advanced breast cancer after adjuvant CMF chemotherapy. Clinical Oncology. 7(1). 12–15. 3 indexed citations
7.
Going, James J., et al.. (1995). Characterization of Extensive Genetic Alterations in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Molecular Analysis. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 87(22). 1694–1704. 57 indexed citations
8.
Clark, James S., et al.. (1993). Altered lymphocyte populations in tumour invaded nodes of breast cancer patients. Immunology Letters. 35(3). 229–234. 17 indexed citations
9.
Cooke, T, Peter Stanton, Gordon Murray, et al.. (1992). Long-term prognostic significance of thymidine labelling index in primary breast cancer. European Journal of Cancer. 28(2-3). 424–426. 15 indexed citations
11.
George, W.D., et al.. (1992). Flow cytometric analysis of tumour-draining lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer. 28(2-3). 350–356. 14 indexed citations
12.
Durie, Fiona H., W.D. George, Ailsa M. Campbell, & Bertil Damato. (1992). Analysis of clonality of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer and uveal melanoma. Immunology Letters. 33(3). 263–269. 7 indexed citations
13.
Campbell, Ailsa M., et al.. (1992). Aneuploid subpopulations in tumour-invaded lymph nodes from breast cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer. 28(2-3). 357–362. 12 indexed citations
14.
Clark, James S., W.D. George, & Ailsa M. Campbell. (1992). Dual colour flow cytometry of p53 and c-erbB-2 expression related to DNA aneuploidy in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Letters. 66(3). 193–200. 9 indexed citations
15.
Clark, James S., et al.. (1992). T cell receptor gamma/delta expression on lymphocyte populations of breast cancer patients. Immunology Letters. 31(3). 279–283. 18 indexed citations
16.
Winstanley, John, et al.. (1991). The long term prognostic significance of c-erbB-2 in primary breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 63(3). 447–450. 186 indexed citations
17.
Winstanley, John, T Cooke, W.D. George, et al.. (1991). The long term prognostic significance of oestrogen receptor analysis in early carcinoma of the breast. British Journal of Cancer. 64(1). 99–101. 31 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, Jeremy, E. Mallon, & W.D. George. (1989). Semiquantitative analyses of fine needle aspirates from benign and malignant breast lesions.. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 42(1). 28–34. 17 indexed citations
19.
Bradnam, Michael S., David Kerr, J. H. McKillop, et al.. (1987). Single photon emission computed tomographic studies (SPECT) of hepatic arterial perfusion scintigraphy (HAPS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 8(12). 1025–1032. 19 indexed citations
20.
Bradnam, Michael S., David Kerr, J. H. McKillop, et al.. (1987). Arteriovenous shunting of microspheres in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Nuclear Medicine Communications. 8(12). 1033–1046. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026