W D George

3.3k total citations
55 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

W D George is a scholar working on Oncology, Cancer Research and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, W D George has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Oncology, 23 papers in Cancer Research and 12 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in W D George's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (19 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers). W D George is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (19 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (9 papers) and Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (9 papers). W D George collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. W D George's co-authors include Gordon Murray, Arnie Purushotham, H. Burns, Gwen M. Allardice, David Morrison, David C. Smith, David Galloway, R A Sellwood, Adrian Harnett and A P M Forrest and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Gut.

In The Last Decade

W D George

54 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W D George United Kingdom 22 1.4k 947 666 533 316 55 2.5k
Sheryl G. A. Gabram United States 27 1.2k 0.8× 1.2k 1.3× 1.1k 1.6× 771 1.4× 240 0.8× 82 2.9k
Margaret Kemeny United States 23 1.4k 1.0× 862 0.9× 364 0.5× 295 0.6× 494 1.6× 71 2.7k
Jean Latreille Canada 30 1.7k 1.2× 805 0.9× 1.0k 1.5× 360 0.7× 558 1.8× 89 3.7k
Brigid K. Killelea United States 25 1.0k 0.7× 1.2k 1.3× 571 0.9× 593 1.1× 269 0.9× 92 2.5k
Kandace P. McGuire United States 25 972 0.7× 1.2k 1.2× 766 1.2× 546 1.0× 321 1.0× 83 2.4k
Johanneke E.A. Portielje Netherlands 33 1.7k 1.2× 745 0.8× 430 0.6× 347 0.7× 571 1.8× 144 3.4k
R. Otter Netherlands 26 1.2k 0.9× 511 0.5× 452 0.7× 295 0.6× 506 1.6× 58 2.7k
R A Sellwood United Kingdom 25 1.3k 0.9× 572 0.6× 262 0.4× 394 0.7× 486 1.5× 65 2.2k
Adnan Ezzat Saudi Arabia 26 1.4k 1.0× 548 0.6× 371 0.6× 722 1.4× 667 2.1× 83 3.2k
Jean Robert Canada 13 1.2k 0.8× 1.2k 1.2× 254 0.4× 575 1.1× 320 1.0× 14 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by W D George

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W D George's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W D George with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W D George more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W D George

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W D George. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W D George. The network helps show where W D George may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W D George

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W D George. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W D George based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W D George. W D George is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Allardice, Gwen M., et al.. (2012). Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women. BMJ. 344(apr26 1). e2718–e2718. 394 indexed citations
2.
Pinder, Sarah E., Catherine Duggan, Ian O. Ellis, et al.. (2010). A new pathological system for grading DCIS with improved prediction of local recurrence: results from the UKCCCR/ANZ DCIS trial. British Journal of Cancer. 103(1). 94–100. 85 indexed citations
3.
Stevenson, Karen, et al.. (2009). Isolation, Characterization, and Differentiation of Thy1.1-Sorted Pancreatic Adult Progenitor Cell Populations. Stem Cells and Development. 18(10). 1389–1398. 16 indexed citations
4.
Zino, Samer, Alan MacIntyre, David Kingsmore, et al.. (2006). Altered sirtuin expression is associated with node-positive breast cancer. British Journal of Cancer. 95(8). 1056–1061. 206 indexed citations
5.
Kingsmore, David, David Hole, C. Gillis, & W D George. (2005). Axillary recurrence in breast cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 31(3). 226–231. 12 indexed citations
6.
Hole, D., et al.. (2005). Does deprivation affect breast cancer management?. British Journal of Cancer. 92(4). 631–633. 11 indexed citations
7.
Millar, Keith, et al.. (2005). A 1-year prospective study of individual variation in distress, and illness perceptions, after treatment for breast cancer. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 58(4). 335–342. 140 indexed citations
8.
Kingsmore, David, et al.. (2003). Increased mortality from breast cancer and inadequate axillary treatment. The Breast. 12(1). 36–41. 4 indexed citations
9.
Stallard, Sheila, Arnie Purushotham, Hisham Mehanna, et al.. (2001). Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast – among factors predicting for recurrence, distance from the nipple is important. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 27(4). 373–377. 14 indexed citations
10.
Malik, Hafiz, Arnie Purushotham, E. Mallon, & W D George. (1999). Influence of tumour bed assessment on local recurrence following breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 25(3). 265–268. 8 indexed citations
11.
George, W D, C S McArdle, David C. Smith, et al.. (1996). Psychological support for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a randomised study. BMJ. 312(7034). 813–816. 161 indexed citations
12.
Forrest, A P M, Helen Stewart, Dawn Everington, et al.. (1996). Randomised controlled trial of conservation therapy for breast cancer: 6-year analysis of the Scottish trial. The Lancet. 348(9029). 708–713. 310 indexed citations
13.
Lamont, D., et al.. (1994). Relation between socioeconomic deprivation and pathological prognostic factors in women with breast cancer. BMJ. 309(6961). 1054–1057. 76 indexed citations
14.
Richards, M A, S.M. O'Reilly, Anthony Howell, et al.. (1990). Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in patients with axillary node-positive breast cancer: an update of the Guy's/Manchester trial.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 8(12). 2032–2039. 77 indexed citations
15.
McCulloch, Peter, et al.. (1990). Coagulation Disturbances in Cancer of the Breast and Colon Measured with Specific Monoclonal Antibody Enzyme Immunoassay for Fibrin-Fibrinogen Degradation Products. Pathophysiology of Haemostasis and Thrombosis. 20(2). 73–80. 12 indexed citations
16.
Galloway, David, et al.. (1987). Morphological and cell kinetic effects of dietary manipulation during colorectal carcinogenesis.. Gut. 28(6). 754–763. 17 indexed citations
17.
Galloway, David, et al.. (1987). Dietary manipulation during experimental colorectal carcinogenesis: A morphological study in the rat. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 2(4). 193–200. 2 indexed citations
18.
George, W D, et al.. (1980). Role of non-medical staff in screening for breast cancer.. BMJ. 280(6208). 147–149. 11 indexed citations
19.
George, W D, et al.. (1980). Hospital work load produced by breast-cancer screening programme run by trained non-medical staff.. BMJ. 281(6241). 653–655. 7 indexed citations
20.
George, W D, et al.. (1976). Screening for breast cancer.. BMJ. 2(6040). 858–860. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026