Raymond Young

449 total citations
22 papers, 291 citations indexed

About

Raymond Young is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Raymond Young has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 291 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 9 papers in Strategy and Management and 9 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Raymond Young's work include Construction Project Management and Performance (11 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (5 papers). Raymond Young is often cited by papers focused on Construction Project Management and Performance (11 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (5 papers). Raymond Young collaborates with scholars based in Australia, China and United States. Raymond Young's co-authors include Simon Poon, Ernest Jordan, Michael Young, Paul O’Connor, Ali Quazi, Adrian T. Wong, Ade Kearns, Michael Jabara Carley, Martin Wood and Vedran Žerjav and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Project Management, Journal of the Association for Information Systems and Project Management Journal.

In The Last Decade

Raymond Young

19 papers receiving 262 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Raymond Young Australia	8	162	121	111	39	36	22	291
Sabin Srivannaboon Thailand	8	218 1.3×	140 1.2×	149 1.3×	50 1.3×	36 1.0×	18	368
Thomas Biedenbach Sweden	7	143 0.9×	170 1.4×	47 0.4×	30 0.8×	12 0.3×	10	294
Maxim Miterev Sweden	7	224 1.4×	171 1.4×	86 0.8×	59 1.5×	32 0.9×	12	362
Steve Burdon Australia	9	97 0.6×	121 1.0×	46 0.4×	38 1.0×	11 0.3×	21	256
Chuan He United States	10	93 0.6×	144 1.2×	93 0.8×	19 0.5×	10 0.3×	17	337
Monica Rolfsen Norway	8	124 0.8×	120 1.0×	99 0.9×	30 0.8×	14 0.4×	18	311
S.C. Santema Netherlands	11	73 0.5×	182 1.5×	73 0.7×	22 0.6×	7 0.2×	41	331
Lajos Szabó Hungary	6	110 0.7×	73 0.6×	44 0.4×	47 1.2×	13 0.4×	24	259
Roya Derakhshan Italy	9	224 1.4×	182 1.5×	33 0.3×	99 2.5×	7 0.2×	14	363
Maria Argyropoulou Greece	11	35 0.2×	99 0.8×	82 0.7×	19 0.5×	15 0.4×	28	322

Countries citing papers authored by Raymond Young

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond Young more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond Young

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond Young. The network helps show where Raymond Young may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raymond Young

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raymond Young. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raymond Young based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raymond Young. Raymond Young is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Young, Raymond & Han Qiao. (2022). WHERE PROJECT MANAGERS CAN GO TO DEVELOP THEIR SOFT SKILLS: A CURRICULUM MAPPING OF UNIVERSITY COURSES IN THE US, EUROPE AND CHINA AGAINST THE ACADEMIC LITERATURE AND IPMA’S ICB4.0. 104–117. 1 indexed citations

Chua, Cecil Eng Huang, et al.. (2022). Explaining Reverse Outcome Tight Control: A Case Study of Mindless/Mindful Governance. Project Management Journal. 53(3). 309–324. 1 indexed citations

Young, Raymond & Vedran Žerjav. (2022). Project benefit realisation and project management the 6Q governance approach. 1 indexed citations

Young, Raymond, et al.. (2019). The relationship between project governance mechanisms and project success. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 13(7). 1496–1521. 21 indexed citations

Young, Michael, et al.. (2014). Project, programme and portfolio maturity: a case study of Australian Federal Government. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. 7(2). 215–230. 23 indexed citations

Young, Raymond & Simon Poon. (2013). Top management support—almost always necessary and sometimes sufficient for success: Findings from a fuzzy set analysis. International Journal of Project Management. 31(7). 943–957. 96 indexed citations

Young, Michael & Raymond Young. (2012). The rise and fall of project management: are we observing the birth of a new discipline?. 3(1). 58–58. 2 indexed citations

Young, Raymond, Michael Young, Ernest Jordan, & Paul O’Connor. (2012). Is strategy being implemented through projects? Contrary evidence from a leader in New Public Management. International Journal of Project Management. 30(8). 887–900. 65 indexed citations

Poon, Simon, et al.. (2011). RE-ASSESSING THE IMPORTANCE OF NECESSARY ORSUFFICIENT CONDITIONS OF CRITICAL SUCCESSFACTORS IN IT PROJECT SUCCESS: A FUZZY SETTHEORETICAPPROACH. University of Canberra Research Portal. 176. 3 indexed citations

10.

Young, Raymond, et al.. (2011). Top management support - fuzzy set analysis finding TMS the most important. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 110–125. 1 indexed citations

11.

Young, Raymond. (2010). ASSIST in Govan – A Case of Accidental Conservation. 21(1). 93–108. 1 indexed citations

12.

Recker, Jan, et al.. (2009). ACIS 2007 Panel Report: Lack of Relevance in IS Research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 24. 7 indexed citations

13.

Young, Raymond. (2006). Estimating the value of IT Project Governance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1 indexed citations

14.

Young, Raymond, et al.. (2006). Blackbody characterization and analysis for infrared scene projection. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 6208. 620819–620819.

15.

Young, Raymond. (2006). What is the ROI for IT project governance? Establishing a benchmark. 59–68. 7 indexed citations

16.

Young, Raymond, et al.. (2006). Development of an IS Relevance Index. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2 indexed citations

17.

Young, Raymond. (2005). An Example of Relevant IS Research for Top Managers on IT Project Failure. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1–13. 5 indexed citations

18.

Young, Raymond. (2005). How projects fail 'successfully': project underperformance explained by inconsistent conceptions of IT project success.

19.

Young, Raymond & Ernest Jordan. (2003). Passion & IT Governance. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 64. 1 indexed citations

20.

Carley, Michael Jabara, et al.. (2000). Regeneration in the 21st Century : Policies into Practice - An Overview of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation Area Regeneration Programme. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact