Raquel Lemos

1.1k citations
33 papers · 516 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Raquel Lemos

29 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

Raquel Lemos
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 219
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 159
  • Physiology 171
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 23
  • Neurology 48
Replace Anne‐Mette Hejl with:
Anne‐Mette Hejl Denmark
Carolina Maruta Portugal
Jihui Lyu China
Patrick Fissler Germany
Samantha L. Allison United States
Carlo de Lena Italy
Russell J. Chander Singapore
Haobo Zhang China
Isabella Hoi Kei Leung Australia
Federica Lupo Italy
Raquel Lemos relative to Anne‐Mette Hejl Denmark Anne‐Mette Hejl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anne‐Mette Hejl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Raquel Lemos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Raquel Lemos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raquel Lemos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raquel Lemos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Raquel Lemos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raquel Lemos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raquel Lemos. The network helps show where Raquel Lemos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Raquel Lemos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Raquel Lemos Line = papers co-authored together Raquel Lemos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201258
2 201657
3 201256
4 201452
5 201450
6 200132
7 201229
8 201525
9 201924
10 201323
11 201218
12 201516
13 202216
14 20229
15 20148
16
Adaptation study of the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test to the Portuguese population
20126
17 20156
18 20225
19 20165
20
Estudo de adaptação do Teste de Recordação Selectiva Livre e Guiada para a população portuguesa
20124

About Raquel Lemos

Raquel Lemos is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology and Physiology, having authored 33 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (14 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (5 papers), Family Support in Illness (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (219 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (159 citations), Physiology (171 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (23 citations) and Neurology (48 citations). Raquel Lemos has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Isabel Santana, Mário R. Simões, Diana Duro, Beatriz Santiago, Miguel Castelo‐Branco, Liliana Letra, Catarina Cunha, Sandra Freitas, Paula Pinto and Miguel Tábuas‐Pereira. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology and Health, Neuroscience, Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease and Geriatrics and gerontology international.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact