Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation
19991.3k citationsSabine Kästner, Mark A. Pinsk et al.Neuronprofile →
Visual Areas Exert Feedforward and Feedback Influences through Distinct Frequency Channels
2014839 citationsAndré M. Bastos, Julien Vezoli et al.Neuronprofile →
Mechanisms of Directed Attention in the Human Extrastriate Cortex as Revealed by Functional MRI
1998705 citationsSabine Kästner, Peter De Weerd et al.profile →
Attentional Stimulus Selection through Selective Synchronization between Monkey Visual Areas
2012523 citationsConrado A. Bosman, Jan‐Mathijs Schoffelen et al.Neuronprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Peter De Weerd
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter De Weerd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter De Weerd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter De Weerd more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter De Weerd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter De Weerd. The network helps show where Peter De Weerd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter De Weerd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter De Weerd.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter De Weerd based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter De Weerd. Peter De Weerd is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bastos, André M., Julien Vezoli, Conrado A. Bosman, et al.. (2014). Visual Areas Exert Feedforward and Feedback Influences through Distinct Frequency Channels. Neuron. 85(2). 390–401.839 indexed citations breakdown →
Kästner, Sabine, Mark A. Pinsk, Peter De Weerd, Robert Desimone, & Leslie G. Ungerleider. (1999). Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation. Neuron. 22(4). 751–761.1257 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Vandenbussche, Erik, Peter De Weerd, & Guy A. Orban. (1993). Texture segregation in the cat - interaction between orientation and contrast. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 34(4). 1237–1237.4 indexed citations
16.
Weerd, Peter De, Erik Vandenbussche, & Guy A. Orban. (1990). Texture segregation in the cat. Perception. 19(3). 410–410.1 indexed citations
Vandenbussche, Erik, et al.. (1989). The contribution of area-17 and area-18 to line orientation discrimination performance in the cat. Perception. 18(4). 512–513.1 indexed citations
19.
Weerd, Peter De, Erik Vandenbussche, & Guy A. Orban. (1987). Is the cat able to judge orientation of illusory contours. Perception. 16(2). 235–235.1 indexed citations
20.
Weerd, Peter De, Guy A. Orban, Erik Vandenbussche, & Rufin Vogels. (1986). Human discrimination of line orientation for brief stimulus exposures. Perception. 15(1).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.