Raoul S. Concepcion
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Cancer Research top 10%
- Oncology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Jay H. FowkeSaundra MotleyDavid F. PensonDaniel A. BarocasJoseph A. SmithNeal D. ShoreMichael S. CooksonLawrence I. Karsh
- Topics
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (38 papers)Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers)Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Raoul S. Concepcion
53 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 739
- Cancer Research 253
- Oncology 215
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 195
- Molecular Biology 165
Countries citing papers authored by Raoul S. Concepcion
This map shows the geographic impact of Raoul S. Concepcion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raoul S. Concepcion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raoul S. Concepcion more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raoul S. Concepcion
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raoul S. Concepcion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raoul S. Concepcion. The network helps show where Raoul S. Concepcion may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raoul S. Concepcion
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raoul S. Concepcion. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raoul S. Concepcion based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raoul S. Concepcion. Raoul S. Concepcion is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 61 | |
| 18 | 44 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Raoul S. Concepcion
Raoul S. Concepcion is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (38 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (21 papers) and Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (739 citations), Cancer Research (253 citations) and Urology (102 citations). Raoul S. Concepcion has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jay H. Fowke, Saundra Motley, David F. Penson, Daniel A. Barocas, Joseph A. Smith, Neal D. Shore, Michael S. Cookson, Lawrence I. Karsh, Celestia S. Higano and Andrew J. Armstrong. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.