Neil M. Schultz
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Genetics
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Emad SiddiquiJason J. SchwartzE. GemmenKrishnan RamaswamyRossella E. NappiRobin KrollBoyka StoykovaJack Mardekian
- Topics
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (20 papers)Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers)Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Neil M. Schultz
38 papers receiving 548 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 191
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 179
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 143
- Genetics 102
- Oncology 97
Countries citing papers authored by Neil M. Schultz
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil M. Schultz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil M. Schultz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil M. Schultz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil M. Schultz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil M. Schultz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil M. Schultz. The network helps show where Neil M. Schultz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil M. Schultz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil M. Schultz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil M. Schultz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil M. Schultz. Neil M. Schultz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 80 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Neil M. Schultz
Neil M. Schultz is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 39 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (20 papers), Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers) and Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (191 citations), Ophthalmology (89 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (143 citations). Neil M. Schultz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Emad Siddiqui, Jason J. Schwartz, E. Gemmen, Krishnan Ramaswamy, Rossella E. Nappi, Robin Kroll, Boyka Stoykova, Jack Mardekian, Stanislav Lechpammer and Daniel J. George. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.