Rachel Irwin

29 papers receiving 442 citations

Peers

Rachel Irwin
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 143
  • General Health Professions 120
  • Economics and Econometrics 104
  • Sociology and Political Science 103
  • Clinical Psychology 76
Replace Melissa Sweet with:
Melissa Sweet Australia
Tiago Correia Portugal
Ivana Cristina de Holanda Cunha Barrêto Brazil
Brigit Toebes Netherlands
Lynne Russell New Zealand
Tessa S. Marcus South Africa
Rajani Ved India
Keri Jupka United States
J. Hope Corbin United States
Oğuz Işık Türkiye
Rachel Irwin relative to Melissa Sweet Australia Melissa Sweet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Melissa Sweet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Irwin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Irwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Irwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Irwin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Irwin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Irwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Irwin. The network helps show where Rachel Irwin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Irwin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Irwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Irwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Irwin. Rachel Irwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 0
3 3
4 0
5 1
6 12
7 60
8 6
9 5
10 23
11 4
12 40
13
Reflections on power, conflict and resolution for the perioperative environment
1
14 7
15
Prioritizing areas for action in the field of population-based prevention of childhood obesity
42
16
Public health in Austria: an analysis of the status of public health
3
17
Differences in costs of and access to pharmaceutical products in the EU
59
18
The challenges of hospital payment systems
16
19
Negotiating feelings in the field: Analyzing the Cultural Shock 1
1
20 20

About Rachel Irwin

Rachel Irwin is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, General Health Professions and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 31 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Technologies (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers) and Health and Conflict Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (59 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (143 citations) and General Health Professions (120 citations). Rachel Irwin has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Panos Kanavos, Godfrey Xuereb, Sotiris Vandoros, Gary Sacks, Elena Nicod, Preeti Patel, Richard Sullivan, Jonathan Cylus, Amandine Garde and Renu Garg. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BMJ and Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026