Rachel Houten

649 citations
29 papers · 369 indexed · h-index 11

Rachel Houten

25 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Rachel Houten
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 90
  • Gastroenterology 87
  • Pharmacology 78
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 61
  • Neurology 27
Replace Mark Blagden with:
Mark Blagden United Kingdom
Paul Kubler Australia
I. G. M. Cleator Canada
Emily Schwartz United States
Verónica Bryant Spain
М. А. Исаков Russia
Tércio De Campos Brazil
Zbigniew Wierzbicki Poland
Carlos Zerrweck Mexico
Asim Maqbool United States
Rachel Houten relative to Mark Blagden United Kingdom Mark Blagden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Mark Blagden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Houten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Houten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Houten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Houten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Houten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Houten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Houten. The network helps show where Rachel Houten may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Houten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rachel Houten Line = papers co-authored together Rachel Houten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20243
3 20232
4 20230
5 20236
6 20234
7 20235
8 20226
9 202210
10 202030
11 20203
12 202021
13 202019
14 201934
15 20171
16
Plerixafor is cost‐effective compared to conventional chemotherapy for first‐line haematopoietic stem cell mobilization: Data from the PHANTASTIC trial
20158
17 201591
18 20134
19 20130
20 201215

About Rachel Houten

Rachel Houten is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Pharmacy, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Transplantation, having authored 29 papers that have together received 369 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers), Pain Management and Treatment (5 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (2 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (2 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (90 citations), Gastroenterology (87 citations), Pharmacology (78 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (61 citations) and Neurology (27 citations). Rachel Houten has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Laura Downey, Simon Murch, Damien Longson, Rui Duarte, Angela Boland, Nigel Fleeman, Alan Haycox, Sophie Beale, Y Dündar and Sarah Richards. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface, Journal of Clinical Apheresis, British journal of surgery and PharmacoEconomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026