Journal of Clinical Apheresis

1.6k papers and 22.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Journal of Clinical Apheresis in the last decades have received a total of 22.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Clinical Apheresis usually cover Hematology (741 papers), Immunology (478 papers) and Genetics (304 papers) specifically the topics of Complement system in diseases (346 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (263 papers) and Blood groups and transfusion (213 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Clinical Apheresis are Robert S. Weinstein, Jeffrey L. Winters, Rasheed A. Balogun, Yanyun Wu, Joseph E. Schwartz, Anand Padmanabhan, Nancy M. Dunbar, Ronald G. Strauss, Volker Witt and Nicole A. Aqui.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Clinical Apheresis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Clinical Apheresis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Clinical Apheresis.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Clinical Apheresis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Clinical Apheresis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Clinical Apheresis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Clinical Apheresis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025