Emily Schwartz
Impact in
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 10%
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Papers in
- Surgery 7
-
- Pediatric Pain Management Techniques 2
- Pharmaceutical studies and practices 2
- Co-authors
- R Eisman (2 shared papers)Saul Surrey (3 shared papers)M Poncz (1 shared paper)Amalia M. Issa (2 shared papers)K.T. Bain (3 shared papers)Jacques Turgeon (2 shared papers)Calvin H. Knowlton (2 shared papers)Rena Zelig (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Nutrition in Clinical Practice (3 papers)Blood (3 papers)Pain Medicine (1 paper)Journal of the American Pharmacists Association (1 paper)Journal of Pain (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesThailandBelgium
In The Last Decade
Emily Schwartz
21 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 34
- Pharmacology 67
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 34
- Hematology 50
- Immunology and Allergy 27
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Schwartz. The network helps show where Emily Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 101 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 35 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1990 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1988 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 1 |
About Emily Schwartz
Emily Schwartz is a scholar working on Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 365 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (2 papers), Cell Adhesion Molecules Research (2 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (2 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (2 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (34 citations), Pharmacology (67 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (34 citations), Hematology (50 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (27 citations). Emily Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Thailand and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include R Eisman, Saul Surrey, M Poncz, Amalia M. Issa, K.T. Bain, Jacques Turgeon, Calvin H. Knowlton, Rena Zelig, Kristin L. Schreiber and Valerie Hruschak. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrition in Clinical Practice, Blood, Pain Medicine, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association and Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.