Lisbeth Sachs

50 papers receiving 806 citations

Peers

Lisbeth Sachs
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 32
  • General Health Professions 296
  • Pharmacy 48
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • Research and Theory 7
Replace Andrea M. Garcia with:
Andrea M. Garcia United States
Kimberly S. Canter United States
Christina M. Amaro United States
Elianne Riska Finland
A. van den Brink-Muinen Netherlands
Milton S. Davis United States
Karen Rich United States
Raymond S. Duff United States
Catherine Robinson United Kingdom
Elisabeth Meloni Vieira Brazil
Lisbeth Sachs relative to Andrea M. Garcia United States Andrea M. Garcia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Andrea M. Garcia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Lisbeth Sachs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lisbeth Sachs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisbeth Sachs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisbeth Sachs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lisbeth Sachs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisbeth Sachs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisbeth Sachs. The network helps show where Lisbeth Sachs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Lisbeth Sachs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Lisbeth Sachs Line = papers co-authored together Lisbeth Sachs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199670
2 199167
3 199255
4 200449
5 200148
6 200144
7 199644
8 200240
9 199539
10
Evil eye or bacteria: Turkish migrant women and Swedish health care
198339
11 199830
12 199830
13 198929
14 200426
15 199226
16 199824
17 199923
18 200122
19 199622
20 199720

About Lisbeth Sachs

Lisbeth Sachs is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Oncology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 908 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Educational Sciences (9 papers), Risk Perception and Management (8 papers), Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research (4 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (3 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (2 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (32 citations), General Health Professions (296 citations), Pharmacy (48 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations) and Research and Theory (7 citations). Lisbeth Sachs has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carol Tishelman, Viveka Adelswärd, Göran Tomson, Adam Taube, Catarina Widmark, Lars‐Christer Hydén, Vinod Diwan, Ingela Krantz, Tore Nilstun and Per Linell. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Psycho-Oncology, Sociology of Health & Illness, Scandinavian Journal of Public Health and The Psychoanalytic Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact