Rachel Applegate
Impact in
- Library and Information Sciences top 0.2%
- Library Science and Information Literacy
- Library Science and Administration
- Information Systems top 5%
- Web and Library Services
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
Papers in
-
- Library Science and Information Literacy 13
- Library Science and Administration 7
-
- Web and Library Services 5
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 2
Rachel Applegate
21 papers receiving 317 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Library and Information Sciences 218
- Information Systems 179
- Information Systems and Management 28
- Communication 18
- Education 76
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Applegate
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Applegate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Applegate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Applegate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Applegate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Applegate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Applegate. The network helps show where Rachel Applegate may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Rachel Applegate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 3 | Models of User Satisfaction: Understanding False Positives | 1993 | 38 |
| 4 | Whose Decline? Which Academic Libraries Are "Deserted" in Terms of Reference Transactions? | 2008 | 37 |
| 5 | 2010 | 26 | |
| 6 | 1993 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 23 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2016 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2006 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 18 | User satisfaction with information services : a test of the disconfirmation-satisfaction model with a library OPAC | 1995 | 4 |
| 19 | Evaluation of library services | 2006 | 2 |
| 20 | 2013 | 2 |
About Rachel Applegate
Rachel Applegate is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Information Systems, Education, Information Systems and Management and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 22 papers that have together received 387 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (13 papers), Library Science and Administration (7 papers), Web and Library Services (5 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (2 papers) and Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (218 citations), Information Systems (179 citations), Information Systems and Management (28 citations), Communication (18 citations) and Education (76 citations). Rachel Applegate has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include K Schilling, Robert Mackoy and Kathy Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Library trends, Reference & User Services Quarterly, Library & Information Science Research and The Library Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.