Stacey Guy

693 total citations
17 papers, 311 citations indexed

About

Stacey Guy is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacey Guy has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 311 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Stacey Guy's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). Stacey Guy is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (3 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers). Stacey Guy collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Stacey Guy's co-authors include Femida Gwadry‐Sridhar, Alexandria Ratzki‐Leewing, Eldon Loh, Swati Mehta, Robert Teasell, Amanda McIntyre, R W Teasell, Peter Bragge, Breanna Wright and Denise Goodwin and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Spinal Cord.

In The Last Decade

Stacey Guy

17 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stacey Guy Canada	9	86	71	65	51	50	17	311
Faizan Kashoo Saudi Arabia	10	19 0.2×	32 0.5×	58 0.9×	4 0.1×	10 0.2×	74	327
Yngve Røe Norway	10	26 0.3×	28 0.4×	52 0.8×	11 0.2×	18 0.4×	31	403
Donna Spencer United States	8	8 0.1×	45 0.6×	28 0.4×	19 0.4×	21 0.4×	19	296
Marcella May United States	10	36 0.4×	51 0.7×	38 0.6×	16 0.3×	5 0.1×	11	374
Juergen Peters Germany	8	63 0.7×	48 0.7×	18 0.3×	49 1.0×	5 0.1×	15	355
William G. White United States	8	77 0.9×	29 0.4×	79 1.2×	304 6.0×	22 0.4×	17	714
Francesco Lavano Italy	7	13 0.2×	52 0.7×	40 0.6×	8 0.2×	6 0.1×	11	223
David Thomas United Kingdom	8	24 0.3×	40 0.6×	90 1.4×	11 0.2×	46 0.9×	12	342
Clare Thomson United Kingdom	9	23 0.3×	42 0.6×	85 1.3×	6 0.1×	31 0.6×	18	357
Noelia María Martín Espinosa Spain	13	47 0.5×	68 1.0×	131 2.0×	10 0.2×	18 0.4×	33	371

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Guy

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Guy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Guy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Guy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Guy

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Guy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Guy. The network helps show where Stacey Guy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacey Guy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacey Guy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacey Guy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacey Guy. Stacey Guy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Bragge, Peter, David J. Allison, Swati Mehta, Stacey Guy, & Eldon Loh. (2021). A pilot living clinical practice guidelines approach was feasible and acceptable to guideline panel members. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 143. 22–29. 5 indexed citations

Guy, Stacey, et al.. (2021). Fulfilling the Potential of Evidence-Based Research: The Collaborative Nature of Implementation. Public Policy & Aging Report. 32(1). 36–38. 1 indexed citations

Sokoloff, Lisa Guttman, Devin J. Sodums, Sid Feldman, et al.. (2020). Building Long-Term Care Staff Capacity During COVID-19 Through Just-in-Time Learning: Evaluation of a Modified ECHO Model. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 22(2). 238–244.e1. 28 indexed citations

Bragge, Peter, et al.. (2019). A systematic review of the content and quality of clinical practice guidelines for management of the neurogenic bladder following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 57(7). 540–549. 18 indexed citations

Wolfe, Dalton L., Anthony S. Burns, Heather Flett, et al.. (2019). Development of an implementation-focused network to improve healthcare delivery as informed by the experiences of the SCI knowledge mobilization network. Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 42(sup1). 34–42. 6 indexed citations

Wolfe, Dalton L., et al.. (2018). An inclusive, online Delphi process for setting targets for best practice implementation for spinal cord injury. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 25(2). 290–299. 7 indexed citations

Guy, Stacey, et al.. (2018). Management of fibromyalgia syndrome. 87(1). 34–37. 5 indexed citations

Loh, Eldon, Stacey Guy, B. Catharine Craven, et al.. (2017). Advancing research and clinical care in the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: Key findings from a Canadian summit. Canadian Journal of Pain. 1(1). 183–190. 1 indexed citations

Mehta, Swati, Amanda McIntyre, Stacey Guy, Robert Teasell, & Eldon Loh. (2015). Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation for the management of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury: a meta-analysis. Spinal Cord. 53(11). 780–785. 47 indexed citations

10.

Mehta, Swati, et al.. (2015). Antidepressants Are Effective in Decreasing Neuropathic Pain After SCI: A Meta-Analysis. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 21(2). 166–173. 19 indexed citations

11.

Mehta, Swati, Amanda McIntyre, Stacey Guy, Robert Teasell, & Eldon Loh. (2015). Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for the Management of Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury: A Meta-Analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 96(10). e117–e117. 13 indexed citations

12.

Guy, Stacey, et al.. (2013). Anticonvulsant medication use for the management of pain following spinal cord injury: systematic review and effectiveness analysis. Spinal Cord. 52(2). 89–96. 39 indexed citations

13.

Guy, Stacey, et al.. (2013). Poster 38 Spinal Cord Injury Best Practice Implementation for Pressure Ulcer Prevention: Initial Implementation Results. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 94(10). e25–e25. 1 indexed citations

14.

Guy, Stacey, et al.. (2012). Social Media: A Systematic Review to Understand the Evidence and Application in Infodemiology. Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering. 1–8. 16 indexed citations

15.

Guy, Stacey, Alexandria Ratzki‐Leewing, & Femida Gwadry‐Sridhar. (2011). Moving Beyond the Stigma: Systematic Review of Video Games and Their Potential to Combat Obesity. International Journal of Hypertension. 2011. 1–13. 93 indexed citations

16.

Guy, Stacey, et al.. (2010). Where's the Evidence for Evidence-based Knowledge in Ehealth Systems?. 310. 29–34. 2 indexed citations

17.

Guy, Stacey, et al.. (2010). Data collection with iPhone Web apps efficiently collecting patient data using mobile devices. 149. 235–239. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact