R. W. Stark
- Insect Science top 1%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies 14
- Insect and Pesticide Research 8
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 6
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control 6
- Ecology top 5%
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 37
-
- Entomological Studies and Ecology 8
-
- Forest ecology and management 5
- Endocrinology top 10%
-
- Fire effects on ecosystems 10
- Co-authors
- David L. WoodF. W. CobbA. A. BerrymanDonald L. DahlstenWilliam E. WatersDonald E. BrightJ. Otto RodinRobert M. Silverstein
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaRussia
In The Last Decade
R. W. Stark
48 papers receiving 579 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Insect Science 445
- Ecology 571
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 201
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 107
- Endocrinology 37
Countries citing papers authored by R. W. Stark
This map shows the geographic impact of R. W. Stark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. W. Stark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. W. Stark more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. W. Stark
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. W. Stark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. W. Stark. The network helps show where R. W. Stark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. W. Stark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1987 | 7 | |
| 2 | Integrated pest management in pine-bark beetle ecosystems | 1985 | 45 |
| 3 | 1985 | 16 | |
| 4 | Treatment tactics and strategies. | 1985 | 21 |
| 5 | 1980 | 14 | |
| 6 | The Douglas-fir tussock moth [Orgyia pseudotsugata]: a synthesis. | 1978 | 1 |
| 7 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1973 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1970 | 16 | |
| 10 | Incidence of bark beetle infestation in injured trees. | 1968 | 14 |
| 11 | Effect of injury upon physical properties of oleoresin, moisture content, and phloem thickness. | 1968 | 7 |
| 12 | 1968 | 23 | |
| 13 | 1965 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1965 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1965 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 17 | 1961 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1961 | 9 | |
| 19 | 1954 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1952 | 12 |
About R. W. Stark
R. W. Stark is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 741 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (37 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (14 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (10 papers), Entomological Studies and Ecology (8 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (8 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (6 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (6 papers) and Forest ecology and management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (445 citations), Ecology (571 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (201 citations). R. W. Stark has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include David L. Wood, F. W. Cobb, A. A. Berryman, Donald L. Dahlsten, William E. Waters, Donald E. Bright, J. Otto Rodin, Robert M. Silverstein, Paul R. Miller and J. R. Parmeter. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Ecology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.