F. W. Cobb
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Cell Biology top 5%
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Papers in
- Cell Biology 30
- Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases 30
-
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions 18
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance 5
- Co-authors
- T. C. Harrington (6 shared papers)William J. Otrosina (9 shared papers)Matteo Garbelotto (10 shared papers)Thomas D. Bruns (10 shared papers)Gary J. Samuels (1 shared paper)Eugene Zavarin (4 shared papers)R. W. Stark (5 shared papers)J. R. Parmeter (7 shared papers)
- Journals
- Mycologia (9 papers)Canadian Journal of Forest Research (7 papers)Phytochemistry (3 papers)Phytopathology (3 papers)Journal of Forestry (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCzechiaRussia
In The Last Decade
F. W. Cobb
55 papers receiving 853 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Insect Science 388
- Cell Biology 439
- Ecology 459
- Plant Science 595
- Endocrinology 67
Countries citing papers authored by F. W. Cobb
This map shows the geographic impact of F. W. Cobb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. W. Cobb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. W. Cobb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. W. Cobb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. W. Cobb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. W. Cobb. The network helps show where F. W. Cobb may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. W. Cobb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1989 | 122 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 58 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 48 | |
| 4 | 1993 | 46 | |
| 5 | 1971 | 44 | |
| 6 | 1972 | 41 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 39 | |
| 8 | 1968 | 37 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 35 | |
| 10 | 1971 | 31 | |
| 11 | 1972 | 27 | |
| 12 | 1985 | 27 | |
| 13 | 1997 | 25 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 24 | |
| 15 | 1968 | 23 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 22 | |
| 17 | Smog injury, root diseases and bark beetle damage in ponderosa pine | 1969 | 21 |
| 18 | Treatment tactics and strategies. | 1985 | 21 |
| 19 | 1991 | 21 | |
| 20 | 1970 | 19 |
About F. W. Cobb
F. W. Cobb is a scholar working on Cell Biology, Plant Science, Ecology, Insect Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 56 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (30 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (22 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (18 papers), Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies (10 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (9 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (8 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (5 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Resistance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (388 citations), Cell Biology (439 citations), Ecology (459 citations), Plant Science (595 citations) and Endocrinology (67 citations). F. W. Cobb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Russia. Frequent co-authors include T. C. Harrington, William J. Otrosina, Matteo Garbelotto, Thomas D. Bruns, Gary J. Samuels, Eugene Zavarin, R. W. Stark, J. R. Parmeter, R. S. Hunt and H. S. Whitney. Their work appears in journals such as Mycologia, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Phytochemistry, Phytopathology and Journal of Forestry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.