R. T. Osborne

953 citations
51 papers · 706 indexed · h-index 13

R. T. Osborne

40 papers receiving 557 citations

Peers

R. T. Osborne
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 230
  • Animal Science and Zoology 120
  • General Psychology 13
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 116
  • Statistics and Probability 75
Replace F.V. Smith with:
F.V. Smith United Kingdom
M. Jackson Marr United States
David Hogan United States
Henry A. Cross United States
John S. Robinson United States
Larry T. Brown United States
Richard A. Maier United States
Marcus B. Waller United States
Donald H. Bullock United States
Valerie D. Hollard New Zealand
R. T. Osborne relative to F.V. Smith United Kingdom F.V. Smith's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
F.V. Smith · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. T. Osborne

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. T. Osborne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. T. Osborne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. T. Osborne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. T. Osborne

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. T. Osborne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. T. Osborne. The network helps show where R. T. Osborne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 7 scholars most cited alongside R. T. Osborne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. T. Osborne Line = papers co-authored together R. T. Osborne links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19928
2 198044
3
Forward and Backward Digit Span Interaction with Race and IQ: A Longitudinal Developmental Comparison.
197932
4 19754
5 19695
6 19692
7 19694
8 196750
9 19676
10 19669
11 19662
12 19653
13 195788
14 19576
15 19560
16 195621
17 19563
18 19551
19 19557
20 19529

About R. T. Osborne

R. T. Osborne is a scholar working on General Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Animal Science and Zoology and Applied Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (7 papers), Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (6 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (3 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (3 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers), School Choice and Performance (3 papers) and Higher Education Research Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (230 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (120 citations), General Psychology (13 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (116 citations) and Statistics and Probability (75 citations). R. T. Osborne has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Clyde E. Noble, Arthur R. Jensen, A. James Gregor, D.G.M. Wood-Gush, John C. Loehlin, Steven G. Vandenberg and William B. Sanders. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, The Journal of Psychology, Psychological Reports, Mankind Quarterly and Heredity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026