R. Schats

5.0k total citations
112 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

R. Schats is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Schats has authored 112 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 76 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 74 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 55 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in R. Schats's work include Ovarian function and disorders (52 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (51 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (49 papers). R. Schats is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (52 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (51 papers) and Reproductive Biology and Fertility (49 papers). R. Schats collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Belgium and United States. R. Schats's co-authors include Cornelis B. Lambalk, Peter G.A. Hompes, Joseph McDonnell, Jan P.W. Vermeiden, J. Schoemaker, Roy Homburg, Jan Willem Lens, Velja Mijatovic, Janet Kwee and Diederik A. Hoozemans and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, JAMA and The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

In The Last Decade

R. Schats

112 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

R. Schats
Alan B. Copperman United States
Alan S. Penzias United States
Judy E. Stern United States
Sheryl van der Poel United States
R Frydman France
Jairo E. García United States
Steven D. Spandorfer United States
R. Schats
Citations per year, relative to R. Schats R. Schats (= 1×) peers Ragaa Mansour

Countries citing papers authored by R. Schats

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Schats's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Schats with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Schats more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Schats

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Schats. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Schats. The network helps show where R. Schats may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Schats

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Schats. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Schats based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Schats. R. Schats is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Schats, R., et al.. (2023). A short versus a long time interval between semen collection and intrauterine insemination: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Human Reproduction. 38(5). 811–819. 1 indexed citations
2.
Balkenende, Eva, C. C. M. Beerendonk, Kathrin Fleischer, et al.. (2022). Fertility preservation for women with breast cancer: a multicentre randomized controlled trial on various ovarian stimulation protocols. Human Reproduction. 37(8). 1786–1794. 24 indexed citations
4.
Juffermans, Lynda J.M., Cornelis B. Lambalk, Freek Groenman, et al.. (2019). Feasibility study for performing uterus transplantation in the Netherlands. Human Reproduction Open. 2020(2). hoz032–hoz032. 15 indexed citations
5.
Schats, R., et al.. (2018). Gestational surrogacy: results of 10 years of experience in the Netherlands. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 37(6). 725–731. 23 indexed citations
6.
Konig, T. E., Marieke O. Verhoeven, R. Schats, et al.. (2017). Unusual Twinning Resulting in Chimerism: A Systematic Review on Monochorionic Dizygotic Twins. Twin Research and Human Genetics. 20(2). 161–168. 33 indexed citations
7.
Caanen, Mirte R., R. Schats, C.G. Vergouw, et al.. (2016). Embryo Transfer with Controlled Injection Speed to Increase Pregnancy Rates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 81(5). 394–404. 8 indexed citations
8.
Dreyer, Kim, M.H. Emanuel, Jos W. R. Twisk, et al.. (2016). Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT. Human Reproduction. 31(9). 2005–2016. 30 indexed citations
9.
Schats, R., et al.. (2014). Efficacy and safety of intrauterine insemination in patients with moderate-to-severe endometriosis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 28(5). 590–598. 23 indexed citations
10.
Vergouw, C.G., et al.. (2013). The association of the blastomere volume index (BVI), the blastomere symmetry index (BSI) and the mean ovality (MO) with ongoing implantation after single embryo transfer. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 30(4). 587–592. 2 indexed citations
11.
Lambers, Marieke J., Thea M. Mooij, Alexandra W. van den Belt‐Dusebout, et al.. (2012). Factors associated with dizygotic twinning after IVF treatment with double embryo transfer. Human Reproduction. 27(10). 2966–2970. 6 indexed citations
12.
Konig, T. E., A. Overbeek, W. K. H. Kuchenbecker, et al.. (2011). The influence of LH substitution for GnRH antagonist blocked endogenous LH in older IVF patients. 26. 1 indexed citations
13.
Broeze, K. A., Marieke J. Lambers, Mervi Haapsamo, et al.. (2011). Is aspirin effective in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF)? Results from an individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD MA). Human Reproduction Update. 17(4). 501–509. 20 indexed citations
14.
Lambers, Marieke J., et al.. (2010). Blood-borne angiogenic factors and sustained multiple implantation: a comparison of singleton and twin pregnancies. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 20(6). 822–830. 3 indexed citations
15.
Mijatovic, Velja, Sebastiaan Veersema, Mark Hans Emanuel, R. Schats, & Peter G.A. Hompes. (2009). Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion device for the treatment of hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with a contraindication for laparoscopy. Fertility and Sterility. 93(4). 1338–1342. 52 indexed citations
16.
Kwee, Janet, R. Schats, Joseph McDonnell, J. Schoemaker, & Cornelis B. Lambalk. (2006). The clomiphene citrate challenge test versus the exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test as a single test for identification of low responders and hyperresponders to in vitro fertilization. Fertility and Sterility. 85(6). 1714–1722. 29 indexed citations
17.
Lambalk, Cornelis B., et al.. (2004). Meerlingzwangerschappen; epidemiologie en beleid. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 6 indexed citations
19.
Roseboom, Tessa J., Jan P.W. Vermeiden, E. Schoute, Jan Willem Lens, & R. Schats. (1995). The probability of pregnancy after embryo transfer is affected by the age of the patient, cause of infertility, number of embryos transferred and the average morphology score, as revealed by multiple logistic regression analysis. Human Reproduction. 10(11). 3035–3041. 110 indexed citations
20.
Nijman, Hans W., Curt W. Burger, Jan P. A. Baak, et al.. (1992). Borderline malignancy of the ovary and controlled hyperstimulation, a report of 2 cases. European Journal of Cancer. 28(12). 1971–1973. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026