Kim Dreyer
About
Kim Dreyer is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.
According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Dreyer has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 366 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 20 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Kim Dreyer's work include Gynecological conditions and treatments (24 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (15 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (7 papers). Kim Dreyer is often cited by papers focused on Gynecological conditions and treatments (24 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (15 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (7 papers). Kim Dreyer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Australia and United Kingdom. Kim Dreyer's co-authors include Velja Mijatovic, Ben W. Mol, Peter G.A. Hompes, Nienke van Welie, Joukje van Rijswijk, R. Schats, Cornelis B. Lambalk, Rui Wang, M.H. Emanuel and R.M.F. van der Weiden and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Reproduction, Fertility and Sterility and European Journal of Endocrinology.
In The Last Decade
Kim Dreyer
32 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Kim Dreyer
Mansueto Gomes Neto Brazil
L. Haaková Czechia
Shauna Reinblatt Canada
Surasak Angsuwathana Thailand
Sedigheh Dehbashi Iran
R Goldchmit Israel
S. Konidaris Greece
Margherita Zanello Italy
Sissel Hjelle Norway
Libera Troìa Italy
Citations per year, relative to Kim Dreyer Kim Dreyer (= 1×)
peers
Mansueto Gomes Neto
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Dreyer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Dreyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Dreyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Dreyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Dreyer
Since
Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Dreyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Dreyer. The network helps show where Kim Dreyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Dreyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Dreyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Dreyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Dreyer. Kim Dreyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
1.
Mol, Ben W., et al.. (2024). No pain relief by virtual reality during hysterosalpingography (HSG): results from a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction. 39(9). 1987–1995.
2.
Welie, Nienke van, Evert J. P. van Santbrink, Teus van Laar, et al.. (2022). Oil-based versus water-based contrast media for hysterosalpingography in infertile women of advanced age, with ovulation disorders or a high risk for tubal pathology: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (H2Oil2 study). BMC Women s Health. 22(1). 123–123.
3.
Welie, Nienke van, Kim Dreyer, Marlies Y. Bongers, et al.. (2021). Safety of oil-based contrast medium for hysterosalpingography: a systematic review. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 42(6). 1119–1129.
4.
Ven, Peter M. van de, Kim Dreyer, Neil Johnson, et al.. (2020). Uterine bathing with sonography gel prior to IVF/ICSI-treatment in patients with endometriosis, a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Human Reproduction Open. 2020(4). hoaa054–hoaa054.
5.
Welie, Nienke van, Artur Ludwin, Wellington P. Martins, Velja Mijatovic, & Kim Dreyer. (2020). Tubal Flushing Treatment for Unexplained Infertility. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 38(1). 74–86.
6.
Welie, Nienke van, Velja Mijatovic, Kim Dreyer, et al.. (2019). Complications after hysterosalpingography with oil- or water-based contrast: results of a nationwide survey. Human Reproduction Open. 2020(1). hoz045–hoz045.
7.
Rijswijk, Joukje van, Nienke van Welie, Kim Dreyer, et al.. (2019). Tubal flushing with oil- or water-based contrast medium: can we identify markers that indicate treatment benefit?. Human Reproduction Open. 2019(3). hoz015–hoz015.
8.
Wang, Rui, Nienke van Welie, Joukje van Rijswijk, et al.. (2019). Effectiveness on fertility outcome of tubal flushing with different contrast media: systematic review and network meta‐analysis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 54(2). 172–181.
9.
Welie, Nienke van, Joukje van Rijswijk, Kim Dreyer, et al.. (2019). Can hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) replace hysterosalpingography (HSG) as first choice tubal patency test: a randomized comparison (foam study)?. Fertility and Sterility. 112(3). e2–e3.
10.
Welie, Nienke van, Kim Dreyer, Joukje van Rijswijk, et al.. (2019). Treatment effect of oil-based contrast is related to experienced pain at HSG: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised H2Oil study. Human Reproduction. 34(12). 2391–2398.
11.
Rijswijk, Joukje van, Clarabelle T. Pham, Kim Dreyer, et al.. (2018). Oil-based or water-based contrast for hysterosalpingography in infertile women: a cost-effective analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility. 110(4). 754–760.
12.
Dreyer, Kim, Rik van Eekelen, Pieternel Steures, et al.. (2018). The therapeutic effect of hysterosalpingography in couples with unexplained subfertility: a post-hoc analysis of a prospective multi-centre cohort study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 38(2). 233–239.
13.
Dreyer, Kim, M.H. Emanuel, Jos W. R. Twisk, et al.. (2016). Hysteroscopic proximal tubal occlusion versus laparoscopic salpingectomy as a treatment for hydrosalpinges prior to IVF or ICSI: an RCT. Human Reproduction. 31(9). 2005–2016.
14.
Dreyer, Kim, et al.. (2016). Hysteroscopic Proximal Tubal Occlusion versus Laparoscopic Salpingectomy as Treatment for Hydrosalpinges Prior to IVF or ICSI: A RCT. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 23(7). S6–S6.
15.
Dreyer, Kim, Peter G.A. Hompes, & Velja Mijatovic. (2015). Diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam-sonography to confirm tubal occlusion after Essure® placement as treatment for hydrosalpinges. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 30(4). 421–425.
16.
Dreyer, Kim, et al.. (2014). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial. Fertility and Sterility. 102(3). 821–825.
17.
Emanuel, M.H., et al.. (2014). Hysterosalpingo-Foam Sonography (HyFoSy): A Less Painful Procedure for Tubal Patency Testing during Fertility Work-Up, Compared to (Serial) Hysterosalpingography. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 21(6). S65–S65.
18.
Veersema, Sebastiaan, Velja Mijatovic, Kim Dreyer, et al.. (2013). Outcomes of Pregnancies in Women With Hysteroscopically Placed Micro-Inserts In Situ. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 21(3). 492–497.
19.
Dreyer, Kim, Velja Mijatovic, M.H. Emanuel, & P. G. A. Hompes. (2012). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy), a new technique to confirm proximal tubal occlusion after treatment of a hydrosalpinx by an ESSURE® device prior to in vitro fertilization (IVF). Fertility and Sterility. 98(3). S224–S224.
20.
Mijatovic, Velja, Kim Dreyer, Mark Hans Emanuel, R. Schats, & Peter G.A. Hompes. (2011). Essure® hydrosalpinx occlusion prior to IVF-ET as an alternative to laparoscopic salpingectomy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 161(1). 42–45.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact
Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mansueto Gomes Neto Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. Haaková Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Shauna Reinblatt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Surasak Angsuwathana Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sedigheh Dehbashi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R Goldchmit Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Konidaris Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Margherita Zanello Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sissel Hjelle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Libera Troìa