Countries citing papers authored by R. Michael Young
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Michael Young's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Michael Young with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Michael Young more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Michael Young
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Michael Young. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Michael Young. The network helps show where R. Michael Young may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Michael Young
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Michael Young.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Michael Young based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Michael Young. R. Michael Young is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Young, R. Michael, et al.. (2018). Perceptual Experience Management. IEEE Transactions on Games. 11(1). 15–24.10 indexed citations
Cardona-Rivera, Rogelio E., et al.. (2014). Foreseeing Meaningful Choices. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment. 10(1). 9–15.15 indexed citations
7.
Young, R. Michael, et al.. (2014). Gameplay as On-Line Mediation Search. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment. 10(3). 42–48.8 indexed citations
Cardona-Rivera, Rogelio E. & R. Michael Young. (2014). Games as Conversation. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment. 10(4). 2–8.1 indexed citations
10.
Sturtevant, Nathan, Jeff Orkin, Michael Cook, et al.. (2014). Playable Experiences at AIIDE 2014. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment. 10(1). 203–210.3 indexed citations
11.
Finlayson, Mark A., Dedre Gentner, Richard J. Gerrig, et al.. (2013). Computational and Cognitive Aspects of Narrative. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 81–82.1 indexed citations
Young, R. Michael, et al.. (2009). A Computational Model of Inferencing in Narrative. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 83–90.13 indexed citations
Riedl, Mark & R. Michael Young. (2005). Open-world planning for story generation. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 72(21). 1719–1720.21 indexed citations
16.
Jhala, Arnav & R. Michael Young. (2005). A discourse planning approach to cinematic camera control for narratives in virtual environments. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 307–312.26 indexed citations
Young, R. Michael, et al.. (2004). Comparing cognitive and computational models of narrative structure. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 385–390.29 indexed citations
19.
Young, R. Michael & J. Whittington. (1993). Using a knowledge analysis to predict conceptual errors in text-editor usage. MIT Press eBooks. 1190–1196.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.