Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The luminous blue variables: Astrophysical geysers
1994549 citationsR. M. Humphreys, Kris DavidsonPublications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacificprofile →
Studies of luminous stars in nearby galaxies. I. Supergiants and O stars in the Milky Way.
Countries citing papers authored by R. M. Humphreys
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. M. Humphreys's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. M. Humphreys with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. M. Humphreys more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. M. Humphreys. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. M. Humphreys. The network helps show where R. M. Humphreys may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. M. Humphreys
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. M. Humphreys.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. M. Humphreys based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. M. Humphreys. R. M. Humphreys is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mehner, A., W. Steffen, J. H. Groh, et al.. (2016). Dissecting a supernova impostor's circumstellar medium: MUSEing about the SHAPE of eta Carinae's outer ejecta. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York).8 indexed citations
Davidson, Kris, A. Mehner, R. M. Humphreys, & John Martin. (2014). Eta Car's spectroscopic event compared to 2009. ATel. 6448. 1.1 indexed citations
12.
Dyk, Schuyler D. Van, P. Challis, R. J. Foley, et al.. (2006). The Type IIn Supernova 2002kg: The Outburst of a Luminous Blue Variable Star in NGC 2403. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
13.
Humphreys, R. M., et al.. (2006). Mapping the Asymmetric Thick Disk. 106.1 indexed citations
14.
Humphreys, R. M.. (1993). The Minnesota lectures on the structure and dynamics of the Milky Way. Astronomical Society of the Pacific eBooks.4 indexed citations
15.
Odewahn, S. C., et al.. (1993). Galaxy Properties at the North Galactic Pole. AAS. 183.1 indexed citations
16.
Pennington, R. L., et al.. (1990). The Automated Plate Scanner Catalog of the Palomar Sky Survey - Astrometry and Photometry. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 22. 1325.1 indexed citations
17.
Berkhuijsen, E. M., et al.. (1988). A catalogue of the brightest stars in the field of M 31.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 76(1). 65–99.2 indexed citations
18.
Humphreys, R. M. & J. Whelan. (1975). On the distance to Centaurus X-3. Observatory. 95. 171–173.1 indexed citations
19.
Humphreys, R. M.. (1973). Spectroscopic., photometric observations of luminous stars in Car-Cen.. Astronomy & Astrophysics Supplement Series. 9. 85.
20.
Humphreys, R. M.. (1969). M Supergiants in the Perseus Arm. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 1. 349.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.