N. Carlin

4.5k total citations
86 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

N. Carlin is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, N. Carlin has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 42 papers in Radiation and 22 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in N. Carlin's work include Nuclear physics research studies (69 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (36 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (26 papers). N. Carlin is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (69 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (36 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (26 papers). N. Carlin collaborates with scholars based in Brazil, United States and Japan. N. Carlin's co-authors include W. G. Gong, A. Szanto de Toledo, R. M. Anjos, W. G. Lynch, M. B. Tsang, R. T. de Souza, P. R. S. Gomes, R. D. Butt, M. Dasgupta and J.O. Newton and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

N. Carlin

82 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
N. Carlin Brazil 23 2.0k 833 635 417 76 86 2.1k
J. Tõke United States 22 1.7k 0.8× 649 0.8× 562 0.9× 454 1.1× 82 1.1× 75 1.8k
F. Hanappe Belgium 26 1.8k 0.9× 780 0.9× 593 0.9× 336 0.8× 96 1.3× 91 1.9k
Michael S. Zisman United States 28 1.8k 0.9× 922 1.1× 691 1.1× 415 1.0× 96 1.3× 109 2.1k
J. S. Winfield United States 31 2.5k 1.3× 950 1.1× 801 1.3× 405 1.0× 73 1.0× 114 2.6k
W. H. Trzaska Finland 26 2.3k 1.2× 1.1k 1.3× 1.0k 1.6× 386 0.9× 86 1.1× 241 2.8k
A. Chatterjee India 27 2.1k 1.1× 880 1.1× 730 1.1× 693 1.7× 128 1.7× 123 2.3k
B. Gebauer Germany 24 1.7k 0.9× 755 0.9× 606 1.0× 323 0.8× 49 0.6× 86 1.9k
Yu. É. Penionzhkevich Russia 25 2.2k 1.1× 769 0.9× 979 1.5× 446 1.1× 56 0.7× 251 2.3k
A. Navin India 27 2.0k 1.0× 869 1.0× 766 1.2× 418 1.0× 30 0.4× 75 2.1k
M. A. McMahan United States 26 2.0k 1.0× 814 1.0× 692 1.1× 646 1.5× 90 1.2× 87 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by N. Carlin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. Carlin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. Carlin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. Carlin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. Carlin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. Carlin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. Carlin. The network helps show where N. Carlin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of N. Carlin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of N. Carlin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of N. Carlin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with N. Carlin. N. Carlin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Seo, Ju‐Hee, N. Carlin, Jin S. Chung, et al.. (2024). Real-time portable muography with Hankuk Atmospheric-muon Wide Landscaping : HAWL. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 225. 112117–112117.
2.
Souza, F. A., N. Carlin, R. Liguori Neto, et al.. (2009). Absolute normalization for uncorrelated background with the event mixing technique. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 612(1). 196–200. 1 indexed citations
3.
Carlin, N., E. M. Szanto, F. Jorge, W. A. Seale, & F. A. Souza. (2009). Estudo experimental do movimento de partículas carregadas em campos elétricos e magnéticos: seletor de velocidades. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 31(2). 2308.1–2308.9.
4.
Dasgupta, M., R. D. Butt, R. M. Anjos, et al.. (2008). Fusion versus Breakup: Observation of Large Fusion Suppression. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
5.
Carlin, N., et al.. (2007). A aproximação de lente fina é sempre válida em experimentos para determinação de distâncias focais?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 29(2). 299–304. 2 indexed citations
6.
Souza, F. A., N. Carlin, M. M. de Moura, et al.. (2004). Study of the Influence of Projectile Breakup on the Fusion Cross Section of6,7Li +12C,59Co. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement. 154. 101–105. 2 indexed citations
7.
Toledo, A. Szanto de, N. Carlin, R. Liguori Neto, et al.. (2003). Fusion of light weakly bound nuclei. Nuclear Physics A. 722. C248–C253. 2 indexed citations
8.
Dasgupta, M., D. J. Hinde, K. Hagino, et al.. (2002). Fusion and breakup in the reactions of6Liand7Linuclei with209Bi. Physical Review C. 66(4). 152 indexed citations
9.
Toledo, A. Szanto de, N. Added, N. Carlin, et al.. (2000). Fusion hindrance in light nuclear systems: binding energy and/or surface diffuseness effect?. Nuclear Physics A. 679(2). 175–181. 8 indexed citations
10.
Cabezas, R., E. M. Szanto, N. Carlin, et al.. (1999). “Elastic fission” of very light nuclear systems. Physical Review C. 60(6). 6 indexed citations
11.
Phair, L., K. Tso, R. Ghetti, et al.. (1995). Reducibility and Thermal Scaling of Charge Distributions in Multifragmentation. Physical Review Letters. 75(2). 213–216. 15 indexed citations
12.
Moretto, L. G., L. Phair, K. Tso, et al.. (1995). Are Multifragment Emission Probabilities Reducible to an Elementary Binary Emission Probability. Physical Review Letters. 74(9). 1530–1533. 31 indexed citations
13.
Phair, L., D. R. Bowman, N. Carlin, et al.. (1993). Azimuthal correlations as a test for centrality in heavy-ion collisions. Nuclear Physics A. 564(3). 453–472. 15 indexed citations
14.
Gong, W. G., Paweł Danielewicz, C. K. Gelbke, et al.. (1993). Two-deuteron correlation functions inN14+27Al collisions atE/A=75 MeV. Physical Review C. 47(2). R429–R432. 9 indexed citations
15.
Phair, L., W. Bauer, D. R. Bowman, et al.. (1992). Multifragment emission in 36Ar+197Au and 129Xe+197Au collisions. Percolation model. Physics Letters B. 285(1-2). 10–14. 24 indexed citations
16.
Fields, D. E., K. Kwiatkowski, S. J. Yennello, et al.. (1992). Excitation functions for complex fragment emission in theE/A=20–100 MeVN14+natAg,Au197reactions. Physical Review C. 45(5). 2300–2319. 26 indexed citations
17.
Kim, Y. D., R. T. de Souza, D. R. Bowman, et al.. (1991). Time scale for emission of intermediate-mass fragments inAr36+197Au collisions atE/A=35 MeV. Physical Review Letters. 67(1). 14–17. 47 indexed citations
18.
Sobotka, L. G., A. Chbihi, D. G. Sarantites, et al.. (1991). Particle multiplicity dependence of high-energy photon production in a heavy-ion reaction. Physical Review C. 44(6). R2257–R2261. 3 indexed citations
19.
Gong, W. G., C. K. Gelbke, N. Carlin, et al.. (1990). Two-proton correlation functions for equilibrium and non-equilibrium emission. Physics Letters B. 246(1-2). 21–25. 21 indexed citations
20.
Tsang, M. B., Y. D. Kim, N. Carlin, et al.. (1990). Azimuthal distributions of fission fragments and α particles emitted in the reactionsAr36+238U atE/A=20 and 35 MeV andN14+238U atE/A=50 MeV. Physical Review C. 42(1). R15–R19. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026