R L Hewer
- Rehabilitation top 0.02%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Neurology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Co-authors
- Derick T WadeV A WoodAlan SunderlandCatherine M. GordonPam EnderbyClive SkilbeckAlexis HellerRachel David
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (36 papers)Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (22 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers)
- Cited by
- RehabilitationPsychiatry and Mental healthPhysical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
- Journals
- The LancetBrainStroke
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
R L Hewer
72 papers receiving 6.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
- Rehabilitation 3.9k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.1k
- Epidemiology 2.0k
- Neurology 1.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by R L Hewer
This map shows the geographic impact of R L Hewer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R L Hewer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R L Hewer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R L Hewer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R L Hewer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R L Hewer. The network helps show where R L Hewer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R L Hewer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R L Hewer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R L Hewer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R L Hewer. R L Hewer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 40 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Stroke. Towards better management. Summary and recommendations of a report of the Royal College of Physicians. | 5 |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 55 | |
| 9 | 71 | |
| 10 | Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis.breakdown → | 715 |
| 11 | 301 | |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 291 | |
| 14 | Stroke: influence of patient's sex and side of weakness on outcome. | 74 |
| 15 | 66 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | Modern medicine : a textbook for students | 2 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 87 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About R L Hewer
R L Hewer is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Neurology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 72 papers that have together received 7.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (36 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (22 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (3.9k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (2.1k citations) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (580 citations). R L Hewer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Derick T Wade, V A Wood, Alan Sunderland, Catherine M. Gordon, Pam Enderby, Clive Skilbeck, Alexis Heller, Rachel David, Elizabeth C. Ward and Dade D. Fletcher. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Brain and Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.