R. Génova-Santos
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Instrumentation
- Atmospheric Science
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- J. A. Rubiño-MartínR. RéboloF. Atrio‐BarandelaC. Hernández–MonteagudoC. H. López-CaraballoR. A. WatsonC. M. GutiérrezKeith Grainge
- Topics
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (20 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers)Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
R. Génova-Santos
32 papers receiving 267 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 265
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 122
- Instrumentation 22
- Atmospheric Science 11
- Ecology 7
Countries citing papers authored by R. Génova-Santos
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Génova-Santos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Génova-Santos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Génova-Santos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Génova-Santos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Génova-Santos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Génova-Santos. The network helps show where R. Génova-Santos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Génova-Santos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Génova-Santos. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Génova-Santos based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Génova-Santos. R. Génova-Santos is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | Optical photometry and low-resolution spectroscopy of the SN 2014J | 0 |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About R. Génova-Santos
R. Génova-Santos is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Instrumentation, having authored 36 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (20 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (17 papers) and Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (265 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (122 citations) and Instrumentation (22 citations). R. Génova-Santos has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include J. A. Rubiño-Martín, R. Rébolo, F. Atrio‐Barandela, C. Hernández–Monteagudo, C. H. López-Caraballo, R. A. Watson, C. M. Gutiérrez, Keith Grainge, Richard D. E. Saunders and Paul F. Scott. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Sensors.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.