Paul F. Scott

3.4k citations
74 papers · 792 indexed · h-index 15

Paul F. Scott

61 papers receiving 747 citations

Peers

Paul F. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 605
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 231
  • Instrumentation 26
  • Spectroscopy 57
  • Aerospace Engineering 72
Replace J. C. Brown with:
J. C. Brown Canada
R. L. Moore United States
G. Wiedemann Germany
P. C. Agrawal India
C. D. Pike United Kingdom
Bernd Klein Germany
Y. Saito Japan
M Jhabvala United States
Bruno López United States
D. Kirkby United States
Paul F. Scott relative to J. C. Brown Canada J. C. Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
J. C. Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul F. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul F. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul F. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul F. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul F. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul F. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul F. Scott. The network helps show where Paul F. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul F. Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul F. Scott Line = papers co-authored together Paul F. Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20231
3 20231
4 20183
5
The courts, devolution and constitutional review
20181
6
Ouster clauses and national security: judicial review of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal
20170
7 20134
8 201216
9 20126
10 20115
11 201137
12 20110
13
The New Zealand legal system : structures and processes
20106
14 20093
15 200923
16
AMI observations of Lynds Dark Nebulae: further evidence for anomalous cm-wave emission ⋆
200912
17
First results from the VSA – III. The CMB power spectrum
20081
18 200812
19
THE COSMIC ANISOTROPY TELESCOPE
19933
20
Contributions of Oil and Gas Environmental Reviews to Coastal Zone Management in Canada
19871

About Paul F. Scott

Paul F. Scott is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Law, having authored 74 papers that have together received 792 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (18 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (18 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (18 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (10 papers), European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (8 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (7 papers), International Law and Human Rights (7 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (605 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (231 citations) and Instrumentation (26 citations). Paul F. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include R. Padman, M. Ryle, Janet M. Lees, A. Lasenby, G. G. Pooley, Keith Grainge, Anna M. M. Scaife, Richard D. E. Saunders, Tim Jenness and Michael E. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026