R. Frater
Impact in
- Urology top 5%
- Hair Growth and Disorders
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Skin and Cellular Biology Research
- Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Papers in
-
- Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques 1
- Urology 7
- Hair Growth and Disorders 7
- Co-authors
- F.J.R. Hird (3 shared papers)Albert Light (2 shared papers)Emil L. Smith (2 shared papers)HJ Moss (2 shared papers)J.R. Kimmel (1 shared paper)Joan T. Wrenn (1 shared paper)Brian S. Spooner (1 shared paper)John F. Ash (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Investigative Dermatology (2 papers)Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture (1 paper)FEBS Letters (1 paper)Nature Communications (1 paper)Nature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
R. Frater
24 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Urology 63
- Cell Biology 135
- Nutrition and Dietetics 60
- Biotechnology 28
- Molecular Biology 219
Countries citing papers authored by R. Frater
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Frater's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Frater with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Frater more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Frater
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Frater. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Frater. The network helps show where R. Frater may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 14 scholars most cited alongside R. Frater, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1973 | 80 | |
| 2 | 1964 | 70 | |
| 3 | 1970 | 68 | |
| 4 | 1960 | 54 | |
| 5 | 1963 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1973 | 29 | |
| 7 | 1970 | 29 | |
| 8 | 1965 | 24 | |
| 9 | 1959 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1968 | 17 | |
| 11 | 1961 | 15 | |
| 12 | 1959 | 13 | |
| 13 | 1980 | 12 | |
| 14 | 1975 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1979 | 10 | |
| 16 | 1981 | 10 | |
| 17 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 18 | 1965 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 4 | |
| 20 | 1966 | 4 |
About R. Frater
R. Frater is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Urology, Cell Biology, Organic Chemistry and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 525 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hair Growth and Disorders (7 papers), Skin and Cellular Biology Research (3 papers), Biotin and Related Studies (2 papers), Food composition and properties (2 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (1 paper), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (1 paper), Freezing and Crystallization Processes (1 paper) and Surgical Sutures and Adhesives (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (63 citations), Cell Biology (135 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (60 citations), Biotechnology (28 citations) and Molecular Biology (219 citations). R. Frater has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include F.J.R. Hird, Albert Light, Emil L. Smith, HJ Moss, J.R. Kimmel, Joan T. Wrenn, Brian S. Spooner, John F. Ash, John R. Yates and Shirley E. Simon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Investigative Dermatology, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, FEBS Letters, Nature Communications and Nature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.