R. F. Bishop

8.4k total citations · 2 hit papers
187 papers, 6.2k citations indexed

About

R. F. Bishop is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, R. F. Bishop has authored 187 papers receiving a total of 6.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 119 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 94 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 31 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in R. F. Bishop's work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (89 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (59 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (45 papers). R. F. Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (89 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (59 papers) and Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (45 papers). R. F. Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. R. F. Bishop's co-authors include P. H. Y. Li, D. J. J. Farnell, J. Arponen, C. E. Campbell, A. Vourdas, K.H. Lührmann, E. Pajanne, Johannes Richter, John Parkinson and Yang Xian and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

In The Last Decade

R. F. Bishop

180 papers receiving 6.1k citations

Hit Papers

Quantum many-particle sys... 1986 2026 1999 2012 1990 1986 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. F. Bishop United Kingdom 40 4.2k 3.0k 1.0k 662 569 187 6.2k
Alexander L. Fetter United States 44 9.7k 2.3× 3.7k 1.2× 1.5k 1.5× 655 1.0× 964 1.7× 159 12.2k
H. Smith Denmark 38 6.4k 1.5× 2.2k 0.7× 302 0.3× 417 0.6× 1.2k 2.2× 138 7.5k
Franz Wegner Germany 39 5.0k 1.2× 5.1k 1.7× 1.3k 1.2× 439 0.7× 1.8k 3.1× 87 8.3k
Chen Ning Yang United States 32 4.5k 1.1× 2.2k 0.7× 2.5k 2.4× 374 0.6× 1.4k 2.4× 106 7.6k
Boris Svistunov United States 52 7.7k 1.9× 4.2k 1.4× 260 0.3× 442 0.7× 351 0.6× 170 8.7k
Nikolay Prokof’ev United States 56 8.7k 2.1× 4.9k 1.6× 315 0.3× 936 1.4× 430 0.8× 200 10.3k
D. ter Haar United Kingdom 29 4.5k 1.1× 1.4k 0.5× 911 0.9× 515 0.8× 1.5k 2.6× 173 7.1k
Ettore Vicari Italy 40 2.6k 0.6× 3.8k 1.2× 2.1k 2.1× 308 0.5× 1.0k 1.8× 231 6.0k
R. Blankenbecler United States 36 2.5k 0.6× 1.6k 0.5× 2.6k 2.5× 300 0.5× 486 0.9× 112 5.4k
Ingo Peschel Germany 35 4.1k 1.0× 3.1k 1.0× 460 0.5× 407 0.6× 1.2k 2.0× 87 5.5k

Countries citing papers authored by R. F. Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. F. Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. F. Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. F. Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. F. Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. F. Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. F. Bishop. The network helps show where R. F. Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. F. Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. F. Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. F. Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. F. Bishop. R. F. Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rousochatzakis, Ioannis, et al.. (2024). Spin-S Kitaev-Heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice: A high-order treatment via the many-body coupled cluster method. Physical Review Research. 6(3). 4 indexed citations
2.
Bishop, R. F., et al.. (2018). Low-energy parameters and spin gap of a frustrated spin-sHeisenberg antiferromagnet with $s \le {3 \over 2}$ honeycomb lattice. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 1041. 12001–12001.
3.
Tilma, Todd, et al.. (2017). Complete correlation characteristic (Weyl) functions for any quantum system or ensemble. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
4.
Li, P. H. Y. & R. F. Bishop. (2017). Gapped paramagnetic state in a frustrated spin-12 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the cross-striped square lattice. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 449. 127–132. 3 indexed citations
5.
Bishop, R. F., P. H. Y. Li, Ronald Zinke, et al.. (2016). The spin-half XXZ antiferromagnet on the square lattice revisited: A high-order coupled cluster treatment. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 428. 178–188. 11 indexed citations
6.
Bishop, R. F., P. H. Y. Li, D. J. J. Farnell, Johannes Richter, & C. E. Campbell. (2012). Frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the checkerboard lattice:J1-J2model. Physical Review B. 85(20). 39 indexed citations
7.
Farnell, D. J. J., K. A. Gernoth, & R. F. Bishop. (2001). CCM Treatment Of An Interpolating Triangle/Kagome Antiferromagnet. Physical Review B. 63. 4 indexed citations
8.
Bishop, R. F., et al.. (2000). Recent progress in many-body theories : the proceedings of the 10th International Conference, Seattle, USA September 10-15, 1999. WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks. 2 indexed citations
9.
Bishop, R. F., D. J. J. Farnell, & M. L. Ristig. (2000). AB INITIO TREATMENTS OF THE ISING MODEL IN A TRANSVERSE FIELD. International Journal of Modern Physics B. 14(15). 1517–1536. 5 indexed citations
10.
Bishop, R. F., et al.. (2000). Simple accurate coupled cluster results for the linear E⊗e pseudo-Jahn–Teller effect. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 113(10). 4008–4015. 2 indexed citations
11.
Bishop, R. F., et al.. (1999). Variational results for the Rabi Hamiltonian. Physics Letters A. 254(3-4). 215–224. 9 indexed citations
12.
Bishop, R. F., et al.. (1996). A microscopic study of the quantum critical behavior of the spin-1/2 anisotropic Heisenberg models. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry. 57(5). 919–927. 4 indexed citations
13.
Bishop, R. F.. (1994). Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Condensed Matter Theories. 2 indexed citations
14.
Bishop, R. F., John Parkinson, & Yang Xian. (1991). A coupled-cluster study of the ground-state energy and properties of an anisotropic quantum spin lattice model exhibiting antiferromagnetism in various phases. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. 80(2-3). 181–205. 11 indexed citations
15.
Bishop, R. F., et al.. (1989). Paths to optimization in the multistate Rayleigh-Ritz variational method: Applications to the double-well quantum anharmonic oscillator. Physical review. A, General physics. 40(11). 6154–6168. 21 indexed citations
16.
Pajanne, E., et al.. (1988). Recent Progress in Many-Body Theories, Vol. 1. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 20(3). 324–332. 14 indexed citations
17.
Vashishta, Priya, Rajiv K. Kalia, & R. F. Bishop. (1987). Condensed Matter Theories. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 31 indexed citations
18.
Owen, J. C., R. F. Bishop, & John M. Irvine. (1977). The equation of state for a model Fermi fluid. Physics Letters B. 66(1). 25–28. 6 indexed citations
19.
Bishop, R. F.. (1973). Ground-state energy of a dilute fermi gas. Annals of Physics. 77(1-2). 106–138. 49 indexed citations
20.
Bishop, R. F.. (1973). Two-Body Scattering with Singular Potentials. Physical Review C. 7(2). 479–488. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026