Q. Eileen Wafford
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Emily G. LattieColleen Stiles‐ShieldsNathan WinquistAndrea K. GrahamElizabeth C AdkinsKatrina E. ChampionNicola C. NewtonBelinda Parmenter
- Topics
- Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers)Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers)
- Journals
- Nature MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Q. Eileen Wafford
40 papers receiving 908 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Applied Psychology 312
- Clinical Psychology 272
- General Health Professions 236
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 192
- Social Psychology 155
Countries citing papers authored by Q. Eileen Wafford
This map shows the geographic impact of Q. Eileen Wafford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Q. Eileen Wafford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Q. Eileen Wafford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Q. Eileen Wafford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Q. Eileen Wafford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Q. Eileen Wafford. The network helps show where Q. Eileen Wafford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Q. Eileen Wafford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Q. Eileen Wafford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Q. Eileen Wafford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Q. Eileen Wafford. Q. Eileen Wafford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Reviewbreakdown → | 448 |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Q. Eileen Wafford
Q. Eileen Wafford is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Family Practice and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 45 papers that have together received 930 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (312 citations), Clinical Psychology (272 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (136 citations). Q. Eileen Wafford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Emily G. Lattie, Colleen Stiles‐Shields, Nathan Winquist, Andrea K. Graham, Elizabeth C Adkins, Katrina E. Champion, Nicola C. Newton, Belinda Parmenter, Maree Teesson and Bonnie Spring. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.