Anubha Agarwal
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Co-authors
- Mark D. HuffmanEhete BahiruDorairaj PrabhakaranClyde W. YancyEric A. PostelJ. Donald M. GassJohn R. GilbertSilke Schmidt
- Topics
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management (19 papers)Medication Adherence and Compliance (12 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers)
- Journals
- JAMANature MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIndia
In The Last Decade
Anubha Agarwal
38 papers receiving 504 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 230
- Molecular Biology 82
- Ophthalmology 82
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 77
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 51
Countries citing papers authored by Anubha Agarwal
This map shows the geographic impact of Anubha Agarwal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anubha Agarwal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anubha Agarwal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anubha Agarwal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anubha Agarwal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anubha Agarwal. The network helps show where Anubha Agarwal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anubha Agarwal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anubha Agarwal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anubha Agarwal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anubha Agarwal. Anubha Agarwal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 62 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 27 | |
| 20 | 37 |
About Anubha Agarwal
Anubha Agarwal is a scholar working on Family Practice, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 517 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (19 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (12 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (42 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (230 citations) and Ophthalmology (82 citations). Anubha Agarwal has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and India. Frequent co-authors include Mark D. Huffman, Ehete Bahiru, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Clyde W. Yancy, Eric A. Postel, J. Donald M. Gass, John R. Gilbert, Silke Schmidt, Margaret A. Pericak‐Vance and S Harikrishnan. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Nature Medicine and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.