Nathan Winquist

1.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 624 citations indexed

About

Nathan Winquist is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nathan Winquist has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 624 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Applied Psychology, 4 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nathan Winquist's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). Nathan Winquist is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (3 papers). Nathan Winquist collaborates with scholars based in United States. Nathan Winquist's co-authors include Emily G. Lattie, Colleen Stiles‐Shields, Andrea K. Graham, Q. Eileen Wafford, Elizabeth C Adkins, Katherine Cohen, Daniel Eisenberg, Sarah Ketchen Lipson, Madhu Reddy and Renwen Zhang and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Psychiatric Services and BMC Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Nathan Winquist

7 papers receiving 606 citations

Hit Papers

Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxie... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nathan Winquist United States 6 355 288 190 165 145 7 624
Cinthia De Leon United States 5 460 1.3× 169 0.6× 117 0.6× 151 0.9× 166 1.1× 7 600
Beth K Jaworski United States 13 287 0.8× 271 0.9× 111 0.6× 122 0.7× 165 1.1× 26 607
Shaun Liverpool United Kingdom 8 267 0.8× 221 0.8× 87 0.5× 69 0.4× 136 0.9× 31 481
Retha Arjadi Indonesia 9 276 0.8× 315 1.1× 223 1.2× 238 1.4× 108 0.7× 21 712
Rebecca Grist United Kingdom 11 591 1.7× 445 1.5× 127 0.7× 178 1.1× 179 1.2× 12 907
Laura Ospina‐Pinillos Australia 11 203 0.6× 104 0.4× 94 0.5× 63 0.4× 195 1.3× 32 429
Arianna A. Aldridge United States 13 119 0.3× 235 0.8× 178 0.9× 98 0.6× 77 0.5× 15 547
H. Patrick Driscoll United States 4 351 1.0× 109 0.4× 63 0.3× 94 0.6× 259 1.8× 5 600
Naira Topooco Sweden 19 803 2.3× 488 1.7× 226 1.2× 449 2.7× 125 0.9× 31 1.1k
Kristina Sinadinovic Sweden 15 462 1.3× 94 0.3× 90 0.5× 99 0.6× 247 1.7× 30 693

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Winquist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Winquist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Winquist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Winquist more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Winquist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Winquist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Winquist. The network helps show where Nathan Winquist may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathan Winquist

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathan Winquist. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathan Winquist based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathan Winquist. Nathan Winquist is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Stiles‐Shields, Colleen, Elizabeth Gray, Charles J. Krause, et al.. (2024). A personal sensing technology enabled service versus a digital psychoeducation control for primary care patients with depression and anxiety: a pilot randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 24(1). 828–828. 2 indexed citations
2.
Lipson, Sarah Ketchen, et al.. (2021). Mental Health Conditions Among Community College Students: A National Study of Prevalence and Use of Treatment Services. Psychiatric Services. 72(10). 1126–1133. 48 indexed citations
3.
Cohen, Katherine, Colleen Stiles‐Shields, Nathan Winquist, & Emily G. Lattie. (2021). Traditional and Nontraditional Mental Healthcare Services: Usage and Preferences Among Adolescents and Younger Adults. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 48(4). 537–553. 29 indexed citations
5.
Lattie, Emily G., Katherine Cohen, Nathan Winquist, & David C. Mohr. (2020). Examining an App-Based Mental Health Self-Care Program, IntelliCare for College Students: Single-Arm Pilot Study. JMIR Mental Health. 7(10). e21075–e21075. 33 indexed citations
6.
Lattie, Emily G., Rachel Kornfield, Kathryn E. Ringland, et al.. (2020). Designing Mental Health Technologies that Support the Social Ecosystem of College Students. PubMed. 2020. 1–15. 53 indexed citations
7.
Lattie, Emily G., Elizabeth C Adkins, Nathan Winquist, et al.. (2019). Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(7). e12869–e12869. 448 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026