P.W.F.M. Hommel

1.7k total citations
28 papers, 275 citations indexed

About

P.W.F.M. Hommel is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, P.W.F.M. Hommel has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 275 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Plant Science, 9 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 9 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in P.W.F.M. Hommel's work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (7 papers). P.W.F.M. Hommel is often cited by papers focused on Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (10 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (7 papers). P.W.F.M. Hommel collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Belgium. P.W.F.M. Hommel's co-authors include Rein de Waal, J. den Ouden, J.H.J. Schaminée, Hansgeorg Binz, Daniel Roth, B.S. van Gemerden, H.P. Wolfert, A. Prins, Frank van Langevelde and Han Olff and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecological Applications, Methods in Ecology and Evolution and Landscape Ecology.

In The Last Decade

P.W.F.M. Hommel

23 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
P.W.F.M. Hommel Netherlands 7 184 108 80 69 65 28 275
Eri Mizumachi Japan 10 195 1.1× 121 1.1× 67 0.8× 96 1.4× 111 1.7× 14 321
Izabela Kałucka Poland 11 155 0.8× 195 1.8× 54 0.7× 110 1.6× 97 1.5× 22 333
Ernst Röhrig Germany 8 135 0.7× 83 0.8× 72 0.9× 81 1.2× 71 1.1× 17 273
Richard Jinks United Kingdom 13 226 1.2× 144 1.3× 119 1.5× 55 0.8× 53 0.8× 23 350
Hisashi Sugita Japan 11 192 1.0× 72 0.7× 45 0.6× 86 1.2× 58 0.9× 34 278
Grant Gerrish United States 10 231 1.3× 83 0.8× 75 0.9× 32 0.5× 105 1.6× 14 321
Katarína Hegedüšová Slovakia 10 178 1.0× 177 1.6× 60 0.8× 84 1.2× 99 1.5× 33 308
Christopher Hawkins Canada 10 167 0.9× 92 0.9× 111 1.4× 68 1.0× 21 0.3× 24 344
Aida López‐Sánchez Spain 11 204 1.1× 86 0.8× 134 1.7× 35 0.5× 37 0.6× 31 322
Kevin F. Cannon United States 5 144 0.8× 114 1.1× 94 1.2× 38 0.6× 126 1.9× 6 309

Countries citing papers authored by P.W.F.M. Hommel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P.W.F.M. Hommel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.W.F.M. Hommel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.W.F.M. Hommel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P.W.F.M. Hommel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.W.F.M. Hommel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.W.F.M. Hommel. The network helps show where P.W.F.M. Hommel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P.W.F.M. Hommel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P.W.F.M. Hommel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P.W.F.M. Hommel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P.W.F.M. Hommel. P.W.F.M. Hommel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., Daniel Roth, Hansgeorg Binz, & Matthias Kreimeyer. (2022). Toward a Method for Evaluating the Applicability of Aluminum Foam Sandwich. Proceedings of the Design Society. 2. 455–464. 1 indexed citations
2.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., et al.. (2021). METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING SUITABLE COMPONENTS FOR FUNCTIONAL INTEGRATION – FOCUSING ON GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS. Proceedings of the Design Society. 1. 2047–2056. 5 indexed citations
3.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., Daniel Roth, & Hansgeorg Binz. (2021). DERIVATION OF MOTIVATORS FOR THE USE OF ALUMINUM FOAM SANDWICH AND ADVANTAGEOUS APPLICATIONS. Proceedings of the Design Society. 1. 933–942. 6 indexed citations
4.
Frenne, Pieter De, Robert Gruwez, P.W.F.M. Hommel, et al.. (2020). Effects of heathland management on seedling recruitment of common juniper (Juniperus communis). Plant Ecology and Evolution. 153(2). 188–198. 4 indexed citations
5.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., Daniel Roth, & Hansgeorg Binz. (2020). DEFICITS IN THE APPLICATION OF ALUMINUM FOAM SANDWICH: AN INDUSTRIAL PERSPECTIVE. Proceedings of the Design Society DESIGN Conference. 1. 927–936. 6 indexed citations
6.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., et al.. (2006). Een verkennend onderzoek aan de hand van 92 SBB-referentiepunten : selectie van ecologisch relevante bodemeigenschappen. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.
7.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., et al.. (2005). Effects of tree species composition on within-forest distribution of understorey species. Applied Vegetation Science. 8(2). 155–155. 52 indexed citations
8.
Gemerden, B.S. van, Rampal S. Etienne, Han Olff, P.W.F.M. Hommel, & Frank van Langevelde. (2005). RECONCILING METHODOLOGICALLY DIFFERENT BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENTS. Ecological Applications. 15(5). 1747–1760. 21 indexed citations
9.
Hommel, P.W.F.M. & R.W. de Waal. (2004). Bodem, humus en vegetatie onder verschillende loofboomsoorten op de stuwwal bij Doorwerth. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1 indexed citations
10.
Hommel, P.W.F.M.. (2004). Ravensbosch en Kloosterbosch. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 20–23.
11.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., et al.. (2003). Oude lindenbossen op Jutland; referentiebeelden voor bosontwikkeling in Nederland?. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 13–21. 1 indexed citations
12.
Hommel, P.W.F.M. & R.W. de Waal. (2003). Rijke bossen op arme bodems; alternatieve boomsoortenkeuze verhoogt soortenrijkdom ondergroei op verzuringgevoelige gronden. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 20(4). 193–204. 4 indexed citations
13.
Hees, A.F.M. van, et al.. (2003). Kleine bossen in het landschap; geschiedenis, waarde en beheer. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
14.
Wolfert, H.P., P.W.F.M. Hommel, A. Prins, & Mariska Stam. (2002). The formation of natural levees as a disturbance process significant to the conservation of riverine pastures. Landscape Ecology. 17(S1). 47–57. 17 indexed citations
15.
Kemmers, R.H., et al.. (2000). Effecten van hydrologische maatregelen tegen verzuring en vermesting op vegetatie, bodem en water in Groot Zandbrink; evaluatie na negen jaar. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1 indexed citations
16.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., et al.. (2000). Kloosterbosch en Ravensbosch. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 9–15.
17.
Schaminée, J.H.J., et al.. (1999). De vegetatie van Nederland. Deel 5 plantengemeenschappen van ruigten, struwelen en bossen. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 50 indexed citations
18.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., et al.. (1995). Conservation and restoration of the Diantho-Armerietum pastures along the river Dinkel. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hommel, P.W.F.M., et al.. (1994). Natuurbehoud en natuurontwikkeling langs Bloemenbeek en Boven-Dinkel : gevolgen van ingrepen in de waterhuishouding van het Dinkelsysteem voor enkele karakteristieke vegetatietypen. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1 indexed citations
20.
Hommel, P.W.F.M.. (1979). Is er een grens tussen het Löss- en het Krijtdistrict?. Gorteria. 9(6). 234–242. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026