Prue Chamberlayne
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Joanna BornatTom WengrafLynn FroggettMichael RustinUrsula ApitzschRobin HumphreyAndrew CooperRichard Freeman
- Topics
- Data Analysis and Archiving (6 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers)Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Prue Chamberlayne
29 papers receiving 738 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sociology and Political Science 521
- Education 176
- Political Science and International Relations 167
- General Health Professions 140
- Clinical Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Prue Chamberlayne
This map shows the geographic impact of Prue Chamberlayne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prue Chamberlayne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prue Chamberlayne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Prue Chamberlayne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Prue Chamberlayne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Prue Chamberlayne. The network helps show where Prue Chamberlayne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Prue Chamberlayne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Prue Chamberlayne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Prue Chamberlayne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Prue Chamberlayne. Prue Chamberlayne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | Bromley by Bow Centre research and evaluation project: integrated practice - focus on older people. | 6 |
| 3 | 50 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | The turn to bıographıcal methods ın socıal scıencebreakdown → | 138 |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 27 | |
| 12 | Welfare and culture in Europe : towards a new paradigm in social policy | 38 |
| 13 | Reminiscence in Care Settings: Implications for Training. | 5 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Prue Chamberlayne
Prue Chamberlayne is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Political Science and International Relations and Conservation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 894 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Data Analysis and Archiving (6 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (5 papers) and Social and Demographic Issues in Germany (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (67 citations), Sociology and Political Science (521 citations) and General Social Sciences (27 citations). Prue Chamberlayne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Joanna Bornat, Tom Wengraf, Lynn Froggett, Michael Rustin, Ursula Apitzsch, Robin Humphrey, Andrew Cooper, Richard Freeman and Stefanie Buckner. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Sociology and Sociology of Health & Illness.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.