Procopius

476 total citations
6 papers, 29 citations indexed

About

Procopius is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology and History. According to data from OpenAlex, Procopius has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 29 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Anthropology, 2 papers in Archeology and 1 paper in History. Recurrent topics in Procopius's work include Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers) and Ancient Near East History (1 paper). Procopius is often cited by papers focused on Classical Antiquity Studies (2 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers) and Ancient Near East History (1 paper). Procopius collaborates with scholars based in . Procopius's co-authors include William G. Sinnigen and Averil Cameron and has published in prestigious journals such as The Classical World and University of Michigan Press eBooks.

In The Last Decade

Procopius

2 papers receiving 20 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Procopius 2 17 17 14 6 2 6 29
Vera von Falkenhausen Italy 4 24 1.4× 24 1.4× 6 0.4× 6 1.0× 2 1.0× 15 39
Milton V. Anastos United States 4 17 1.0× 11 0.6× 7 0.5× 8 1.3× 10 27
Ann Freeman United States 5 23 1.4× 21 1.2× 10 0.7× 2 0.3× 8 35
Lawrence Nees United States 5 33 1.9× 27 1.6× 18 1.3× 6 1.0× 20 55
Léopold Delisle 3 13 0.8× 15 0.9× 4 0.3× 6 1.0× 4 29
Werner Seibt Austria 4 28 1.6× 16 0.9× 18 1.3× 19 3.2× 18 37
Venance Grumel 3 24 1.4× 13 0.8× 8 0.6× 14 2.3× 20 29
Frank M. Clover United States 3 11 0.6× 8 0.5× 8 0.6× 16 2.7× 15 27
Paul Speck 4 20 1.2× 11 0.6× 8 0.6× 12 2.0× 21 27
Photius 3 9 0.5× 7 0.4× 5 0.4× 7 1.2× 4 22

Countries citing papers authored by Procopius

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Procopius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Procopius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Procopius more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Procopius

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Procopius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Procopius. The network helps show where Procopius may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Procopius

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Procopius. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Procopius based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Procopius. Procopius is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
3.
Procopius, et al.. (1968). La guerra gotica di Procopio di Cesarea.
4.
Sinnigen, William G., Procopius, & Averil Cameron. (1968). Procopius, History of the Wars "(Persian, Gothic)," "Secret History," and "Buildings." Newly Translated, Edited, Abridged, and with an Introduction. The Classical World. 62(1). 28–28.
5.
Procopius, et al.. (1962). Procopii Caesariensis opera omnia. 27 indexed citations
6.
Procopius. (1960). Secret History. University of Michigan Press eBooks. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026