Ferdinand Lot

858 citations
8 papers · 26 · h-index 3

Impact in

    • Medieval Literature and History
  • History top 10%
    • European Political History Analysis
    • Historical and Archaeological Studies
    • Historical Studies of British Isles

Papers in

    • European Political History Analysis 3
    • Medieval and Early Modern Iberia 1
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 1
    • Social Sciences and Governance 1
Journals
The American Historical Review (1 paper)Population (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)H. Champion eBooks (1 paper)Classiques des sciences sociales. (2 papers)

In The Last Decade

Ferdinand Lot

5 papers receiving 16 citations

Peers

Ferdinand Lot
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Classics 8
  • History 13
  • History and Philosophy of Science 5
  • Theoretical Computer Science 1
  • Archeology 5
Replace Léopold Delisle with:
Léopold Delisle
Henry J. John France
Nicholas M. Haring
Tore Nyberg Poland
Remigio Sabbadini
Jürgen Miethke Germany
Maarten J.F.M. Hoenen
A. C. Krey United States
Jacques Boussard
Roger Bowers South Korea
Ferdinand Lot relative to Léopold Delisle Léopold Delisle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Léopold Delisle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ferdinand Lot

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ferdinand Lot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferdinand Lot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferdinand Lot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ferdinand Lot

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ferdinand Lot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ferdinand Lot. The network helps show where Ferdinand Lot may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Ferdinand Lot, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ferdinand Lot Line = papers co-authored together Ferdinand Lot links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 195813
2
Recueil des travaux historiques de Ferdinand Lot
19685
3 19593
4 19632
5
Fidèles ou vassaux
19772
6
Études sur les légendes épiques françaises
19701
7 20060
8 20060

About Ferdinand Lot

Ferdinand Lot is a scholar working on History, Urban Studies, Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory and Infectious Diseases, having authored 8 papers that have together received 26 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include European Political History Analysis (3 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper), Social Sciences and Governance (1 paper), Medieval and Early Modern Iberia (1 paper), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper) and Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (8 citations), History (13 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (1 citation) and Archeology (5 citations). Frequent co-authors include Joseph R. Strayer. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Population, Medical Entomology and Zoology, H. Champion eBooks and Classiques des sciences sociales..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact