Pramote Prasartkul

27 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers

Pramote Prasartkul
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • General Health Professions 143
  • Sociology and Political Science 142
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 139
  • Health 104
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 74
Replace Desirée Ciambrone with:
Desirée Ciambrone United States
Zhihong Sa China
Greg L. Drevenstedt United States
Gideon Rutaremwa Uganda
Zhifei He China
Aravinda Meera Guntupalli United Kingdom
Jeroen K. Van Ginneken Netherlands
Uzoma O. Okoye Nigeria
Emily Smith‐Greenaway United States
Sarah Lovell New Zealand
Pramote Prasartkul relative to Desirée Ciambrone United States Desirée Ciambrone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Desirée Ciambrone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pramote Prasartkul

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pramote Prasartkul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pramote Prasartkul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pramote Prasartkul more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pramote Prasartkul

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pramote Prasartkul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pramote Prasartkul. The network helps show where Pramote Prasartkul may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pramote Prasartkul

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pramote Prasartkul. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pramote Prasartkul based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pramote Prasartkul. Pramote Prasartkul is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 9
2 4
3 21
4 9
5
Perceived Negative and Positive Impacts of Redefining Older Persons in Thailand
3
6 40
7
Availability of Adult Children with Elderly Parents and Their Spatial Patterns: Evidence from a Rural District, Northeastern Thailand
2
8
Incompleteness of registration data on centenarians in Thailand.
0
9 12
10 20
11 48
12 14
13 97
14 1
15 24
16 23
17
Has China completed demographic transition
2
18 7
19 10
20 20

About Pramote Prasartkul

Pramote Prasartkul is a scholar working on Demography, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Health, having authored 29 papers that have together received 459 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (9 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers) and Migration and Labor Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (104 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (139 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations). Pramote Prasartkul has collaborated with scholars based in Thailand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ramesh Adhikari, Kusol Soonthorndhada, Patama Vapattanawong, Ronald R. Rindfuss, Aphichat Chamratrithirong, Rossarin Soottipong Gray, Fariha Haseen, Yawarat Porapakkham, Sureeporn Punpuing and Alan D López. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, International Journal of Epidemiology and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026